These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31109530)

  • 61. Distribution of materials in construction and demolition waste in Portugal.
    Coelho A; de Brito J
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Aug; 29(8):843-53. PubMed ID: 20498131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Risk sharing for PPP project in construction waste recycling industry in China.
    Liu J; Hua Z; Pang Y; Wang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(9):12614-12628. PubMed ID: 34402006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Methodology for quantification of waste generated in Spanish railway construction works.
    de Guzmán Báez A; Villoria Sáez P; del Río Merino M; García Navarro J
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):920-4. PubMed ID: 22321896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making.
    Di Maria A; Eyckmans J; Van Acker K
    Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():3-21. PubMed ID: 29398268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Quantifying the Carbon Reduction Potential of Recycling Construction Waste Based on Life Cycle Assessment: A Case of Jiangsu Province.
    Liu H; Guo R; Tian J; Sun H; Wang Y; Li H; Yao L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Analysis of the socio-economic and environmental impacts of construction waste and management practices.
    Tafesse S; Girma YE; Dessalegn E
    Heliyon; 2022 Mar; 8(3):e09169. PubMed ID: 35368528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The S-curve for forecasting waste generation in construction projects.
    Lu W; Peng Y; Chen X; Skitmore M; Zhang X
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():23-34. PubMed ID: 27485070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An analytical framework of "zero waste construction site": Two case studies of Shenzhen, China.
    Lu W; Bao Z; Lee WMW; Chi B; Wang J
    Waste Manag; 2021 Feb; 121():343-353. PubMed ID: 33418446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Prediction of large-scale demolition waste generation during urban renewal: A hybrid trilogy method.
    Yu B; Wang J; Li J; Zhang J; Lai Y; Xu X
    Waste Manag; 2019 Apr; 89():1-9. PubMed ID: 31079722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Construction and demolition waste applications and maximum daily output in Spanish recycling plants.
    Rodríguez G; Sáez Del Bosque IF; Asensio E; Sánchez de Rojas MI; Medina C
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Apr; 38(4):423-432. PubMed ID: 32072878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Turning waste expanded polystyrene into lightweight aggregate: Towards sustainable construction industry.
    Adhikary SK; Ashish DK
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 837():155852. PubMed ID: 35561919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Combined use of waste concrete and glass as a replacement for mortar raw materials.
    Letelier V; Henríquez-Jara BI; Manosalva M; Moriconi G
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 94():107-119. PubMed ID: 31279387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Critical success factors for small contractors to conduct green building construction projects in Singapore: identification and comparison with large contractors.
    Shan M; Liu WQ; Hwang BG; Lye JM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Mar; 27(8):8310-8322. PubMed ID: 31900775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong.
    Jaillon L; Poon CS; Chiang YH
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):309-20. PubMed ID: 18434128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A bi-level environmental impact assessment framework for comparing construction and demolition waste management strategies.
    Yazdanbakhsh A
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():401-412. PubMed ID: 29709308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Sorting efficiency in mechanical sorting of construction and demolition waste.
    Hyvärinen M; Ronkanen M; Kärki T
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jul; 38(7):812-816. PubMed ID: 32342764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Strategies for enhancing the accuracy of evaluation and sustainability performance of building.
    Hossain MU; Ng ST
    J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 261():110230. PubMed ID: 32148300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Estimation of construction and demolition waste volume generation in new residential buildings in Spain.
    Villoria Sáez P; del Río Merino M; Porras-Amores C
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Feb; 30(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 22081383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Framework for economic assessment of concrete waste management strategies.
    El-Shaboury N; Abdelhamid M; Marzouk M
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Mar; 37(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 30541406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Evolution game analysis on behavioral strategies of multiple stakeholders in construction waste resource industry chain.
    Liu J; Teng Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(7):19030-19046. PubMed ID: 36220964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.