688 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31111402)
1. Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.
Rencz F; Tamási B; Brodszky V; Gulácsi L; Weszl M; Péntek M
Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Jun; 20(Suppl 1):43-55. PubMed ID: 31111402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care.
Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S; Pieterse AH; Kroonenberg PM; Scholl I; van der Weijden T; Luyten GP; Kruitwagen RF; den Ouden H; Carlier IV; van Vliet IM; Zitman FG; Stiggelbout AM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132158. PubMed ID: 26151946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
Ballesteros J; Moral E; Brieva L; Ruiz-Beato E; Prefasi D; Maurino J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28431587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire.
De las Cuevas C; Perestelo-Perez L; Rivero-Santana A; Cebolla-Martí A; Scholl I; Härter M
Health Expect; 2015 Dec; 18(6):2143-53. PubMed ID: 24593044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.
Scholl I; Kriston L; Dirmaier J; Härter M
Health Expect; 2015 Feb; 18(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 23176071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire--physician version (SDM-Q-Doc).
Scholl I; Kriston L; Dirmaier J; Buchholz A; Härter M
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Aug; 88(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 22480628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between physicians' and patients' perspectives of shared decision making in primary care settings in Japan: The impact of environmental factors.
Goto Y; Miura H; Son D; Scholl I; Kriston L; Härter M; Sato K; Kusaba T; Arai H
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246518. PubMed ID: 33566830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire: the entire process from translation to validation.
Alzubaidi H; Hussein A; Mc Namara K; Scholl I
BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e026672. PubMed ID: 30948608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample.
Kriston L; Scholl I; Hölzel L; Simon D; Loh A; Härter M
Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Jul; 80(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 19879711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring shared decision-making in the pediatric outpatient setting: Psychometric performance of the SDM-Q-9 and CollaboRATE among English and Spanish speaking parents in the US Midwest.
Hurley EA; Bradley-Ewing A; Bickford C; Lee BR; Myers AL; Newland JG; Goggin K
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Apr; 102(4):742-748. PubMed ID: 30448047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shared Decision Making During Active Psychiatric Hospitalization: Assessment and Psychometric Properties.
Zisman-Ilani Y; Roe D; Scholl I; Härter M; Karnieli-Miller O
Health Commun; 2017 Jan; 32(1):126-130. PubMed ID: 27168160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing psychometric properties of Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in an Italian real-world psychiatric clinical sample.
De Filippis R; Aloi M; Reina S; Cantavenara A; Steardo L; De Fazio P; Segura-Garcia C
Riv Psichiatr; 2023; 58(4):167-174. PubMed ID: 37409434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spanish validation endorsement of SDM-Q-9, a new approach.
Alvarado-Villa GE; Moncayo-Rizzo JD; Gallardo-Rumbea JA
BMC Public Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):106. PubMed ID: 30674297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan.
Goto Y; Yamaguchi Y; Onishi J; Arai H; Härter M; Scholl I; Kriston L; Miura H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Nov; 21(1):314. PubMed ID: 34763705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process.
Barr PJ; Thompson R; Walsh T; Grande SW; Ozanne EM; Elwyn G
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jan; 16(1):e2. PubMed ID: 24389354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of shared decision making in Romania from the patient perspective: A cross-sectional multicentric study.
Baicus C; Balanescu P; Zeh S; Oprisan E; Lapadatu R; Gurghean A; Padureanu V; Rezus C; Mitu F; Jurcut R; Balanescu AR; Daha I; Balanescu E; Bojinca M; Pinte L; Constantin AM; Dima N; Floria M; Leon-Constantin MM; Roca M; Mitu M; Chiriac S; Badescu CM; Ionescu SD; Mitrea E; Rosu G; Rezus E; Ionescu GD; Visinescu AM; Mihailescu G; Badea CG
J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):1152-1159. PubMed ID: 31407420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reliability and validity for Chinese version of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire].
Luo B; Xiao S
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Jul; 44(7):823-829. PubMed ID: 31413223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometric Properties of the 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9): Validation of the Italian Version in a Large Psychiatric Clinical Sample.
de Filippis R; Aloi M; Pilieci AM; Boniello F; Quirino D; Steardo L; Segura-Garcia C; De Fazio P
Clin Neuropsychiatry; 2022 Aug; 19(4):264-271. PubMed ID: 36101644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies-A systematic review.
Doherr H; Christalle E; Kriston L; Härter M; Scholl I
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173904. PubMed ID: 28358864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Its Association with Decision Conflict and Patient Factors in Japanese Primary Care.
Goto Y; Miura H; Son D; Arai H; Kriston L; Scholl I; Härter M; Sato K; Kusaba T
JMA J; 2020 Jul; 3(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 33150255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
