These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31112104)

  • 1. Effect of Stepwise Voltage Escalation on Treatment Outcomes following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Study.
    Ng CF; Yee CH; Teoh JYC; Lau B; Leung SCH; Wong CYP; Wong KT; Chu WCW; Yuen J
    J Urol; 2019 Nov; 202(5):986-993. PubMed ID: 31112104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Skuginna V; Nguyen DP; Seiler R; Kiss B; Thalmann GN; Roth B
    Eur Urol; 2016 Feb; 69(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 26119561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Focal Zone Size on Treatment Outcomes and Renal Injury Following Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Study.
    Ng CF; Yee CH; Teoh JYC; Chiu PKF; Kong AWY; Lau BSY; Leung SCH; Wong KT; Chu WCW
    J Endourol; 2024 May; 38(5):505-512. PubMed ID: 38482817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A low or high BMI is a risk factor for renal hematoma after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones.
    Nussberger F; Roth B; Metzger T; Kiss B; Thalmann GN; Seiler R
    Urolithiasis; 2017 Jun; 45(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 27576325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute.
    Ng CF; Lo AK; Lee KW; Wong KT; Chung WY; Gohel D
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):837-42. PubMed ID: 22819406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Effect of Different Kidney Protection Treatment Protocols on Acute Renal Injury After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.
    Ng CF; Luke S; Yee CH; Chu WC; Wong KT; Yuen JW
    J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 27762628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Renal protective effect of N-acetylcysteine with stepwise ramping voltage against extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-induced renal injury: a prospective randomized trial.
    Desoky EAE; Sakr AM; Alhefnawy M; Omran M; Abdalla MMH; Shahin AS; Ali MM
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Dec; 52(12):2261-2267. PubMed ID: 32729099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extremely-slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal stones <20 mm.
    Ito K; Takahashi T; Kanno T; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
    Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 33314807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of renal calculi treatment via different extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) pathways.
    Yuan S; Velmurugan R; Bharathi SP
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2024 Sep; 56(9):2887-2895. PubMed ID: 38581588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of escalating versus fixed voltage treatment on stone comminution and renal injury during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.
    Lambert EH; Walsh R; Moreno MW; Gupta M
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):580-4. PubMed ID: 20018316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.
    Torricelli FC; Marchini GS; Yamauchi FI; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Srougi M; Monga M; Mazzucchi E
    J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2002-7. PubMed ID: 25524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of output voltage distribution on stone comminution efficiency during shockwave lithotripsy in renal or ureteropelvic junction stones: a preliminary study.
    You D; Park J; Hong B; Park HK
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2010 Sep; 44(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 20446817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.
    Micali S; Sighinolfi MC; Celia A; De Stefani S; Grande M; Cicero AF; Bianchi G
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1020-2. PubMed ID: 16890682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy versus slow power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy in stones with high attenuation value: A randomized comparative study.
    Al-Dessoukey AA; Abdallah M; Moussa AS; Sayed O; Abdelbary AM; Abdallah R; Massoud AM; Abdelhamid MH; Elmarakbi AA; Ragheb AM; ElSheemy MS; Ghoneima W
    Int J Urol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31793084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with subcapsular hematoma formation following electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy.
    Dhar NB; Thornton J; Karafa MT; Streem SB
    J Urol; 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 1):2271-4. PubMed ID: 15538247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study.
    Yilmaz E; Batislam E; Basar M; Tuglu D; Mert C; Basar H
    Urology; 2005 Dec; 66(6):1160-4. PubMed ID: 16360432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Slow vs rapid delivery rate shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
    Salem HK; Fathy H; Elfayoumy H; Aly H; Ghonium A; Mohsen MA; Hegazy Ael R
    J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1370-4. PubMed ID: 24262496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Keoghane S; Parkin J; Keeley FX; Timoney AG
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2055-8; discussion 2058. PubMed ID: 17070254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter.
    Elkoushy MA; Hassan JA; Morehouse DD; Anidjar M; Andonian S
    Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):759-63. PubMed ID: 21550641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.
    De Sio M; Autorino R; Quarto G; Mordente S; Giugliano F; Di Giacomo F; Neri F; Quattrone C; Sorrentino D; De Domenico R; D'Armiento M
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 17550410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.