These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31112838)

  • 1. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
    Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood Ratio Calculation Using LRmix Studio.
    Foley MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():307-328. PubMed ID: 37439990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
    Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
    Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
    Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples.
    Alladio E; Omedei M; Cisana S; D'Amico G; Caneparo D; Vincenti M; Garofano P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():143-150. PubMed ID: 30173123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
    Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited.
    Kalafut T; Pugh S; Gill P; Abbas S; Semaan M; Mansour I; Curran J; Bright JA; Hicks T; Wivell R; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 34651300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and validation of Kongoh ver. 3.0.1: Open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation in the GlobalFiler system based on a quantitative continuous model.
    Manabe S; Fukagawa T; Fujii K; Mizuno N; Sekiguchi K; Akane A; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2022 Feb; 54():101972. PubMed ID: 34629243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
    Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; McGovern C; Cooper S; Russell L; Abarno D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():226-239. PubMed ID: 27235797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.
    Cheng K; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Curran J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2138-2155. PubMed ID: 34553371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
    Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.