166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31113000)
1. Software tools for literature screening in systematic reviews in biomedical research.
Van der Mierden S; Tsaioun K; Bleich A; Leenaars CHC
ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):508-517. PubMed ID: 31113000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation.
Harrison H; Griffin SJ; Kuhn I; Usher-Smith JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31931747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis.
Cowie K; Rahmatullah A; Hardy N; Holub K; Kallmes K
JMIR Med Inform; 2022 May; 10(5):e33219. PubMed ID: 35499859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to structure Microsoft Excel documents for systematic reviews.
Godino L
Nurse Res; 2023 Mar; 31(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 36856031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing a database of systematic reviews of animal studies.
Langendam MW; Magnuson K; Williams AR; Walker VR; Howdeshell KL; Rooney AA; Hooijmans CR
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104940. PubMed ID: 33964349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of alternative screening methods for systematic reviews using text mining tools.
Li J; Kabouji J; Bouhadoun S; Tanveer S; Filion KB; Gore G; Josephson CB; Kwon CS; Jette N; Bauer PR; Day GS; Subota A; Roberts JI; Lukmanji S; Sauro K; Ismaili AA; Rahmani F; Chelabi K; Kerdougli Y; Seulami NM; Soumana A; Khalil S; Maynard N; Keezer MR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 162():72-80. PubMed ID: 37506951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey.
Scott AM; Forbes C; Clark J; Carter M; Glasziou P; Munn Z
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():80-94. PubMed ID: 34242757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.
Schmidt L; Sinyor M; Webb RT; Marshall C; Knipe D; Eyles EC; John A; Gunnell D; Higgins JPT
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Sep; 181():65-75. PubMed ID: 37596160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gray literature in systematic reviews on population health in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping.
Chaabna K; Cheema S; Abraham A; Alrouh H; Mamtani R; Sheikh JI
Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(1):94. PubMed ID: 30021616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
Colombini D; Occhipinti E
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review.
Cierco Jimenez R; Lee T; Rosillo N; Cordova R; Cree IA; Gonzalez A; Indave Ruiz BI
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):322. PubMed ID: 36522637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unsupervised title and abstract screening for systematic review: a retrospective case-study using topic modelling methodology.
Natukunda A; Muchene LK
Syst Rev; 2023 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 36597132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani M; Hammady H; Fedorowicz Z; Elmagarmid A
Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):210. PubMed ID: 27919275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages: a mixed method design.
Cleo G; Scott AM; Islam F; Julien B; Beller E
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):145. PubMed ID: 31221212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Data extraction and comparison for complex systematic reviews: a step-by-step guideline and an implementation example using open-source software.
Afifi M; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
Syst Rev; 2023 Dec; 12(1):226. PubMed ID: 38041161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Systematic Review Toolbox: keeping up to date with tools to support evidence synthesis.
Johnson EE; O'Keefe H; Sutton A; Marshall C
Syst Rev; 2022 Dec; 11(1):258. PubMed ID: 36457048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Twister: A Tool for Reducing Screening Time in Systematic Literature Reviews.
Kreiner K; Hayn D; Schreier G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 255():5-9. PubMed ID: 30306896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
