These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31113036)

  • 1. Comparison of the SIM, API 20C, and ID 32C Systems for Identification of Yeasts Isolated from Fruit Juice Concentrates and Beverages.
    Deak T; Beuchat LR
    J Food Prot; 1993 Jul; 56(7):585-592. PubMed ID: 31113036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of simplified and commercial systems for identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deák T; Beuchat LR
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 7(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 3079471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
    Gutierrez J; Martin E; Lozano C; Coronilla J; Nogales C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 7856946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of Phoenix™ Yeast ID Panel and API® ID 32C commercial systems for the identification of Candida species isolated from clinical samples].
    Gayibova Ü; Dalyan Cılo B; Ağca H; Ener B
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2014 Jul; 48(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 25052110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the API ATB 32C system for the rapid identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Rohm H; Lechner F; Lehner M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1990 Dec; 11(3-4):215-23. PubMed ID: 2282283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the MicroScan enzyme-based system for the identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deak T; Beuchat LR
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1995 Oct; 79(4):439-46. PubMed ID: 7592137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Pfaller MA; Preston T; Bale M; Koontz FP; Body BA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2054-8. PubMed ID: 3182994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative performance of Fungichrom I, Candifast and API 20C Aux systems in the identification of clinically significant yeasts.
    Gündeş SG; Gulenc S; Bingol R
    J Med Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 50(12):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 11761197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX, MALDI-TOF MS, and rDNA Sequencing for a Wide Range of Clinically Isolated Yeast Species: Improved Identification by Combining 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX as an Alternative Strategy for Developing Countries.
    Arastehfar A; Daneshnia F; Kord M; Roudbary M; Zarrinfar H; Fang W; Hashemi SJ; Najafzadeh MJ; Khodavaisy S; Pan W; Liao W; Badali H; Rezaie S; Zomorodian K; Hagen F; Boekhout T
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():21. PubMed ID: 30828570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of the BD Phoenix ID Yeast System for the Species Identification of Clinical Yeast-Like Organisms].
    Kanesaka I; Kanayama A; Itou T; Uchino U; Koyama H; Matsuzaki K; Matsumoto S; Kobayashi I
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 2017; 90(6):787-91. PubMed ID: 30277369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of clinical yeasts by Vitek MS system compared with API ID 32 C.
    Durán-Valle MT; Sanz-Rodríguez N; Muñoz-Paraíso C; Almagro-Moltó M; Gómez-Garcés JL
    Med Mycol; 2014 May; 52(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 24782106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of the Iatron serological Candida check kit and the API 20C kit for identification of medically important Candida species.
    Shinoda T; Kaufman L; Padhye AA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 7016900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species isolated from bovine intramammary infection.
    Fadda ME; Pisano MB; Scaccabarozzi L; Mossa V; Deplano M; Moroni P; Liciardi M; Cosentino S
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7692-7. PubMed ID: 24119798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Yeast species associated with orange juice: evaluation of different identification methods.
    Arias CR; Burns JK; Friedrich LM; Goodrich RM; Parish ME
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Apr; 68(4):1955-61. PubMed ID: 11916718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.