BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31113194)

  • 1. The use of European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer calculator as a diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy indication.
    Breza J; Subin F; Bernadic M; Tomas M; Pindak D
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2019; 120(5):331-335. PubMed ID: 31113194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the ERSPC Risk Calculator in a Contemporary Dutch Clinical Cohort.
    Gayet M; Mannaerts CK; Nieboer D; Beerlage HP; Wijkstra H; Mulders PFA; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):228-234. PubMed ID: 28753781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
    Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive predictive value of prostate biopsy indicated by prostate-specific-antigen-based prostate cancer screening: trends over time in a European randomized trial*.
    Bokhorst LP; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1654-60. PubMed ID: 23043563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Calculator for Prostate Cancer Risk 4 Years After an Initially Negative Screen: Findings from ERSPC Rotterdam.
    Roobol MJ; Zhu X; Schröder FH; van Leenders GJ; van Schaik RH; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW
    Eur Urol; 2013 Apr; 63(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 22841675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostate-specific antigen-based early detection of prostate cancer--validation of screening without rectal examination.
    Schröder FH; Roobol-Bouts M; Vis AN; van der Kwast T; Kranse R
    Urology; 2001 Jan; 57(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 11164149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validating the European randomised study for screening of prostate cancer (ERSPC) risk calculator in a contemporary South African cohort.
    Kowlessur B; Phull M; Patel B; Henry M; Lazarus J
    World J Urol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):1711-1718. PubMed ID: 31522234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.
    Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
    Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; van den Bergh RC; Wolters T; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jan; 55(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 18406045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compliance with biopsy recommendations of a prostate cancer risk calculator.
    van Vugt HA; Roobol MJ; Busstra M; Kil P; Oomens EH; de Jong IJ; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Korfage I
    BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(10):1480-8. PubMed ID: 21933335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
    Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 18423977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
    Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No reason for immediate repeat sextant biopsy after negative initial sextant biopsy in men with PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or greater (ERSPC, Rotterdam).
    Roobol MJ; van der Cruijsen IW; Schröder FH
    Urology; 2004 May; 63(5):892-7; discussion 897-9. PubMed ID: 15134973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observational study comparing the accuracy/variability between the ERSPC and the PCPT risk calculators for the prediction of significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA <10 ng/mL.
    Gomez Gomez E; Salamanca Bustos JJ; Carrasco Valiente J; Fernandez Rueda JL; Blanca A; Valero Rosa J; Bravo Arrebola I; Marquez López J; Jimenez Vacas JM; Luque R; Requena Tapia MJ
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e031032. PubMed ID: 31722940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the prediction of prostate biopsy outcome using the Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium (CPCC) Risk Calculator and the Asian adapted Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Risk Calculator in Chinese and European men.
    Chen R; Verbeek JFM; Yang Y; Song Z; Sun Y; Roobol MJ
    World J Urol; 2021 Jan; 39(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 32279141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator: External Validation, Variability, and Clinical Significance.
    Gómez-Gómez E; Carrasco-Valiente J; Blanca-Pedregosa A; Barco-Sánchez B; Fernandez-Rueda JL; Molina-Abril H; Valero-Rosa J; Font-Ugalde P; Requena-Tapia MJ
    Urology; 2017 Apr; 102():85-91. PubMed ID: 27840252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing unnecessary biopsies while detecting clinically significant prostate cancer including cribriform growth with the ERSPC Rotterdam risk calculator and 4Kscore.
    Verbeek JFM; Bangma CH; Kweldam CF; van der Kwast TH; Kümmerlin IP; van Leenders GJLH; Roobol MJ
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 30528698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The digital rectal examination (DRE) remains important - outcomes from a contemporary cohort of men undergoing an initial 12-18 core prostate needle biopsy.
    Palmerola R; Smith P; Elliot V; Reese CT; Mahon FB; Harpster LE; Icitovic N; Raman JD
    Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6542-7. PubMed ID: 23228289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
    Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.