These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3111339)

  • 1. A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure.
    Cameron AE; Parker CJ; Field ES; Gray RC; Wyatt AP
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 May; 69(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 3111339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal wound closure: a controlled trial of polyamide (nylon) and polydioxanone suture (PDS).
    Leaper DJ; Allan A; May RE; Corfield AP; Kennedy RH
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):273-5. PubMed ID: 3931536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subcuticular Prolene or PDS for skin closure?
    Vipond MN; Higgins AF
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1991 Apr; 36(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 2051429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: Prolene versus Dexon.
    Lewis RT; Wiegand FM
    Can J Surg; 1989 May; 32(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2540896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subcuticular skin closure following minor breast biopsy: Prolene is superior to polydioxanone (PDS).
    Aitken RJ; Anderson ED; Goldstraw S; Chetty U
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1989 Jun; 34(3):128-9. PubMed ID: 2509688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
    Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
    Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incisional closure in morbidly obese patients.
    Cleveland RD; Zitsch RP; Laws HL
    Am Surg; 1989 Jan; 55(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 2492414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Single-layer closure of a subcostal incision using a monofilament absorbable suture material--comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglyconate (Maxon)].
    Vracko J; Pegan V
    Acta Chir Iugosl; 1989; 36(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 2496545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs.
    Steen S; Andersson L; Löwenhielm P; Stridbeck H; Walther B; Holmin T
    Surgery; 1984 Feb; 95(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 6420918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernias: a prospective randomised trial.
    Hilgert RE; Dörner A; Wittkugel O
    Eur J Surg; 1999 Apr; 165(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 10365834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy.
    Sajid MS; Parampalli U; Baig MK; McFall MR
    Int J Surg; 2011; 9(8):615-25. PubMed ID: 22061310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure.
    Bloemen A; van Dooren P; Huizinga BF; Hoofwijk AG
    Br J Surg; 2011 May; 98(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 21254041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PDS II (polydioxanone) is the monofilament suture of choice for subcuticular wound closure following breast biopsy.
    Johnstone AJ; John TG; Thompson AM; Charles MH; Dixon JM
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Apr; 37(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 1377271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen.
    Niggebrugge AH; Hansen BE; Trimbos JB; van de Velde CJ; Zwaveling A
    Eur J Surg; 1995 Sep; 161(9):655-61. PubMed ID: 8541424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a prospective comparative clinical trial.
    Krukowski ZH; Cusick EL; Engeset J; Matheson NA
    Br J Surg; 1987 Sep; 74(9):828-30. PubMed ID: 3117165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Polydioxanone sternal sutures for prevention of sternal dehiscence.
    Luciani N; Anselmi A; Gandolfo F; Gaudino M; Nasso G; Piscitelli M; Possati G
    J Card Surg; 2006; 21(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 17073957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abdominal wound closure: a trial of Prolene and Dexon.
    Cameron AE; Gray RC; Talbot RW; Wyatt AP
    Br J Surg; 1980 Jul; 67(7):487-8. PubMed ID: 6251939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modified midline abdominal wound closure technique in complicated/high risk laparotomies.
    Murtaza B; Ali Khan N; Sharif MA; Malik IB; Mahmood A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 20141691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antibacterial [corrected] coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection.
    Justinger C; Moussavian MR; Schlueter C; Kopp B; Kollmar O; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2009 Mar; 145(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 19231586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective randomized trial of suture material in aural wound closure.
    Willatt DJ; Durham L; Ramadan MF; Bark-Jones N
    J Laryngol Otol; 1988 Sep; 102(9):788-90. PubMed ID: 3139811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.