299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31113757)
1. Can Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT replace conventional imaging modalities for primary lymph node and bone staging of prostate cancer?
Esen T; Kılıç M; Seymen H; Acar Ö; Demirkol MO
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):218-220. PubMed ID: 31113757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of
Schwenck J; Rempp H; Reischl G; Kruck S; Stenzl A; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; la Fougère C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 27557844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6.
Lengana T; Lawal IO; Boshomane TG; Popoola GO; Mokoala KMG; Moshokoa E; Maes A; Mokgoro NP; Van de Wiele C; Vorster M; Sathekge MM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Oct; 16(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 30120038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of
Regula N; Kostaras V; Johansson S; Trampal C; Lindström E; Lubberink M; Velikyan I; Sörensen J
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4993. PubMed ID: 32193430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Hruby G; Eade T; Emmett L; Ho B; Hsiao E; Schembri G; Guo L; Kwong C; Hunter J; Byrne K; Kneebone A
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):343-346. PubMed ID: 29663686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Perera M; Papa N; Roberts M; Williams M; Udovicich C; Vela I; Christidis D; Bolton D; Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG
Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):403-417. PubMed ID: 30773328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Kopp J; Kopp D; Bernhardt E; Manka L; Beck A; Gerullis H; Karakiewicz P; Schoerner W; Hammerer P; Schiffmann J
World J Urol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):3085-3090. PubMed ID: 32103332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
Corfield J; Perera M; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):519-527. PubMed ID: 29344682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of Primary Lymph Node Staging of Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer with
Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samartunga H; Yaxley AJ; Coughlin G; Delahunt B; Egevad L; McEwan L; Wong D
J Urol; 2019 Apr; 201(4):815-820. PubMed ID: 30672842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of
Zhang Q; Zang S; Zhang C; Fu Y; Lv X; Zhang Q; Deng Y; Zhang C; Luo R; Zhao X; Wang W; Wang F; Guo H
J Transl Med; 2017 Nov; 15(1):230. PubMed ID: 29115970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography?
Kulkarni SC; Sundaram PS; Padma S
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Feb; 41(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 31714366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of
Walacides D; Meier A; Knöchelmann AC; Meinecke D; Derlin T; Bengel FM; Ross TL; Wester HJ; Derlin K; Kuczyk MA; von Klot CAJ; Christiansen H; Henkenberens C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 May; 195(5):420-429. PubMed ID: 30610354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the Staging/Restaging Performance of 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lee MT; Lin CL; Kao CH
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 May; 44(5):365-376. PubMed ID: 30888999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study between
Wong HS; Leung J; Bartholomeusz D; Sutherland P; Le H; Nottage M; Iankov I; Chang JH
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 62(6):816-822. PubMed ID: 30152050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Klingenberg S; Jochumsen MR; Ulhøi BP; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Borre M; Bouchelouche K
J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 32444374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a utility of adding skeletal imaging to 68-Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/computed tomography in initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer?
Raju S; Sharma A; Patel C; Sahoo R; Das CJ; Kumar S; Sharma A; Kumar R
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Nov; 41(11):1183-1188. PubMed ID: 32796451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
