These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31114527)
1. Does It Matter Whether You or Your Brain Did It? An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of the Double Subject Fallacy on Moral Responsibility Judgments. Maoz U; Sita KR; van Boxtel JJA; Mudrik L Front Psychol; 2019; 10():950. PubMed ID: 31114527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements. Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of a defendant's body weight on perceptions of guilt. Schvey NA; Puhl RM; Levandoski KA; Brownell KD Int J Obes (Lond); 2013 Sep; 37(9):1275-81. PubMed ID: 23295503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas. Fessinger MB; Kovera MB Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. It's OK if 'my brain made me do it': people's intuitions about free will and neuroscientific prediction. Nahmias E; Shepard J; Reuter S Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):502-16. PubMed ID: 25195077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias. Patry MW Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. From Neuroscience to Law: Bridging the Gap. Pernu TK; Elzein N Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1862. PubMed ID: 33192747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The outlandish, the realistic, and the real: contextual manipulation and agent role effects in trolley problems. Gold N; Pulford BD; Colman AM Front Psychol; 2014; 5():35. PubMed ID: 24523708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Your visual system provides all the information you need to make moral judgments about generic visual events. De Freitas J; Alvarez GA Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():133-146. PubMed ID: 29852427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony. Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt. Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "False positive" emotions, responsibility, and moral character. Anderson RA; Kamtekar R; Nichols S; Pizarro DA Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104770. PubMed ID: 34023670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions. Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas. Henderson KS; Levett LM Law Hum Behav; 2018 Oct; 42(5):427-441. PubMed ID: 30047747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferring influence of people's emotions at court on defendant's emotions using a prediction model. Song Y; Zhao T Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1131724. PubMed ID: 36949927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation. Ruva CL; Guenther CC Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]