These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31114955)

  • 1. Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect.
    Tanda T; Kawahara JI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1880-1889. PubMed ID: 31114955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can templates-for-rejection suppress real-world affective objects in visual search?
    Brown CRH; Derakshan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1843-1855. PubMed ID: 38316718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional guidance varies with display density.
    Van de Weijgert M; Van der Burg E; Donk M
    Vision Res; 2019 Nov; 164():1-11. PubMed ID: 31401217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probing early attention following negative and positive templates.
    Zhang Z; Gapelin N; Carlisle NB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1166-1175. PubMed ID: 31650519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.
    Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 38418806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Size congruity influences visual search via the target template.
    Sobel KV; Puri AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():66-74. PubMed ID: 29351863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search.
    Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):902-12. PubMed ID: 25321485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-down suppression of negative features applies flexibly contingent on visual search goals.
    Forstinger M; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1120-1147. PubMed ID: 38627277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid and reflexive feature-based attention.
    Lin JY; Hubert-Wallander B; Murray SO; Boynton GM
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22010204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Toffanin P; Luria R; Jolicoeur P
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 19804791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.
    Arita JT; Carlisle NB; Woodman GF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):580-4. PubMed ID: 22468723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional templates for target features versus locations.
    Jimenez M; Wang Z; Grubert A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):22306. PubMed ID: 39333717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feature-based attention elicited by precueing in an orientation discrimination task.
    Huang D; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Bu X; Chen Y
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():15-25. PubMed ID: 29763696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrospective cues based on object features improve visual working memory performance in older adults.
    Gilchrist AL; Duarte A; Verhaeghen P
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2016; 23(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 26208404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.