These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31115252)

  • 1. Equitable Thresholding and Clustering: A Novel Method for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clustering in AFNI.
    Cox RW
    Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):529-538. PubMed ID: 31115252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FMRI Clustering in AFNI: False-Positive Rates Redux.
    Cox RW; Chen G; Glen DR; Reynolds RC; Taylor PA
    Brain Connect; 2017 Apr; 7(3):152-171. PubMed ID: 28398812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations.
    Woo CW; Krishnan A; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():412-9. PubMed ID: 24412399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.
    Logan BR; Geliazkova MP; Rowe DB
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1379-89. PubMed ID: 18064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sparse geostatistical analysis in clustering fMRI time series.
    Ye J; Lazar NA; Li Y
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug; 199(2):336-45. PubMed ID: 21641934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A non-parametric statistical test to compare clusters with applications in functional magnetic resonance imaging data.
    Fujita A; Takahashi DY; Patriota AG; Sato JR
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(28):4949-62. PubMed ID: 25185759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False positive control of activated voxels in single fMRI analysis using bootstrap resampling in comparison to spatial smoothing.
    Darki F; Oghabian MA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1331-7. PubMed ID: 23664823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of consensus clustering-based framework for brain segmentation using resting fMRI.
    Ryali S; Chen T; Padmanabhan A; Cai W; Menon V
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():128-40. PubMed ID: 25450335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iterative approach of dual regression with a sparse prior enhances the performance of independent component analysis for group functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data.
    Kim YH; Kim J; Lee JH
    Neuroimage; 2012 Dec; 63(4):1864-89. PubMed ID: 22939873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving reliability of subject-level resting-state fMRI parcellation with shrinkage estimators.
    Mejia AF; Nebel MB; Shou H; Crainiceanu CM; Pekar JJ; Mostofsky S; Caffo B; Lindquist MA
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():14-29. PubMed ID: 25731998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust brain parcellation using sparse representation on resting-state fMRI.
    Zhang Y; Caspers S; Fan L; Fan Y; Song M; Liu C; Mo Y; Roski C; Eickhoff S; Amunts K; Jiang T
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Nov; 220(6):3565-79. PubMed ID: 25156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal-spatial mean-shift clustering analysis to improve functional MRI activation detection.
    Ai L; Xiong J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 34(9):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 27469315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An integrated cluster-wise significance measure for fMRI analysis.
    Ge Y; Chen G; Waltz JA; Hong LE; Kochunov P; Chen S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jun; 43(8):2444-2459. PubMed ID: 35233859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hidden Markov event sequence models: toward unsupervised functional MRI brain mapping.
    Faisan S; Thoraval L; Armspach JP; Foucher JR; Metz-Lutz MN; Heitz F
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 15691723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resting state fMRI-guided fiber clustering.
    Ge B; Guo L; Lv J; Hu X; Han J; Zhang T; Liu T
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 2):149-56. PubMed ID: 21995024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of FMRI data using an integrated principal component analysis and supervised affinity propagation clustering approach.
    Zhang J; Tuo X; Yuan Z; Liao W; Chen H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 58(11):3184-96. PubMed ID: 21859596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ant Colony Clustering for ROI Identification in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Veloz A; Weinstein A; Pszczolkowski S; Hernández-García L; Olivares R; Muñoz R; Taramasco C
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2019; 2019():5259643. PubMed ID: 32082371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of fMRI: effect of the use of contextual information.
    Salli E; Korvenoja A; Visa A; Katila T; Aronen HJ
    Neuroimage; 2001 Mar; 13(3):459-71. PubMed ID: 11170811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating spatial dependence into Bayesian multiple testing of statistical parametric maps in functional neuroimaging.
    Brown DA; Lazar NA; Datta GS; Jang W; McDowell JE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():97-112. PubMed ID: 23981437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.