These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31115622)

  • 1. Bone mineral density measurements derived from dual-layer spectral CT enable opportunistic screening for osteoporosis.
    Roski F; Hammel J; Mei K; Baum T; Kirschke JS; Laugerette A; Kopp FK; Bodden J; Pfeiffer D; Pfeiffer F; Rummeny EJ; Noël PB; Gersing AS; Schwaiger BJ
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6355-6363. PubMed ID: 31115622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening: contrast-enhanced dual-layer spectral CT provides accurate measurements of vertebral bone mineral density.
    Roski F; Hammel J; Mei K; Haller B; Baum T; Kirschke JS; Pfeiffer D; Woertler K; Pfeiffer F; Noël PB; Gersing AS; Schwaiger BJ
    Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3147-3155. PubMed ID: 33052464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone mineral density measurements in vertebral specimens and phantoms using dual-layer spectral computed tomography.
    Mei K; Schwaiger BJ; Kopp FK; Ehn S; Gersing AS; Kirschke JS; Muenzel D; Fingerle AA; Rummeny EJ; Pfeiffer F; Baum T; Noël PB
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17519. PubMed ID: 29235542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DXA-equivalent quantification of bone mineral density using dual-layer spectral CT scout scans.
    Laugerette A; Schwaiger BJ; Brown K; Frerking LC; Kopp FK; Mei K; Sellerer T; Kirschke J; Baum T; Gersing AS; Pfeiffer D; Fingerle AA; Rummeny EJ; Proksa R; Noël PB; Pfeiffer F
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4624-4634. PubMed ID: 30758656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of volumetric bone mineral density assessment using dual-source dual-energy versus quantitative CT: a phantom study.
    Koch V; Hokamp NG; Albrecht MH; Gruenewald LD; Yel I; Borggrefe J; Wesarg S; Eichler K; Burck I; Gruber-Rouh T; Lenga L; Vogl TJ; Martin SS; Wichmann JL; Hammerstingl RM; Alizadeh LS; Mader C; Huizinga NA; D'Angelo T; Ascenti G; Mazziotti S; Booz C
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2021 Oct; 5(1):43. PubMed ID: 34608576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of iCare quantitative computed tomography in bone mineral density assessment of the hip and vertebral bodies in European spine phantom.
    Liu F; Zhu H; Ma J; Miao L; Chen S; Yin Z; Wang H
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Oct; 18(1):777. PubMed ID: 37845720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in Routine Computed Tomography of the Spine: Comparison With Dedicated Quantitative CT.
    Sollmann N; Löffler MT; El Husseini M; Sekuboyina A; Dieckmeyer M; Rühling S; Zimmer C; Menze B; Joseph GB; Baum T; Kirschke JS
    J Bone Miner Res; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1287-1296. PubMed ID: 35598311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy of bone mineral density measurement using dual-energy spectral CT and quantitative CT: a comparative phantom study.
    Li X; Li X; Li J; Jiao X; Jia X; Zhang X; Fan G; Yang J; Guo J
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Apr; 75(4):320.e9-320.e15. PubMed ID: 31882174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of bone mineral density quantification using dual-layer spectral detector CT: a phantom study.
    van Hamersvelt RW; Schilham AMR; Engelke K; den Harder AM; de Keizer B; Verhaar HJ; Leiner T; de Jong PA; Willemink MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4351-4359. PubMed ID: 28374079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score assessment in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.
    Salzmann SN; Okano I; Jones C; Zhu J; Lu S; Onyekwere I; Balaji V; Reisener MJ; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Carrino JA; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Sama AA; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 35342015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?
    Salzmann SN; Shirahata T; Yang J; Miller CO; Carlson BB; Rentenberger C; Carrino JA; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 30343044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT.
    Yu EW; Thomas BJ; Brown JK; Finkelstein JS
    J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Jan; 27(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 21915902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thoracic Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Can Sensitively Monitor Bone Mineral Metabolism: Comparison of Thoracic QCT vs Lumbar QCT and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Detection of Age-relative Change in Bone Mineral Density.
    Mao SS; Li D; Syed YS; Gao Y; Luo Y; Flores F; Child J; Cervantes M; Kalantar-Zadeh K; Budoff MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 28844601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia diagnosed using quantitative CT in 296 consecutive lumbar fusion patients.
    Carlson BB; Salzmann SN; Shirahata T; Ortiz Miller C; Carrino JA; Yang J; Reisener MJ; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Aug; 49(2):E5. PubMed ID: 32738803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by routine CT in Southern Europe.
    Alacreu E; Moratal D; Arana E
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Mar; 28(3):983-990. PubMed ID: 28108802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
    Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of bone density using the 1.5 T or 3.0 T MRI-based vertebral bone quality score in older patients undergoing spine surgery: does field strength matter?
    Lin W; He C; Xie F; Chen T; Zheng G; Yin H; Chen H; Wang Z
    Spine J; 2023 Aug; 23(8):1172-1181. PubMed ID: 37031891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative calcium-based assessment of osteoporosis in dual-layer spectral CT.
    Do TD; Rahn S; Melzig C; Heußel CP; Stiller W; Kauczor HU; Weber TF; Skornitzke S
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Sep; 178():111606. PubMed ID: 39018645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee LJ; del Rio AM; Lauder T; Bruce RJ; Summers RM; Pooler BD; Binkley N
    J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Sep; 26(9):2194-203. PubMed ID: 21590738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.