176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31116380)
1. A Troubling Court Decision for Reproductive Rights: Legal Recognition of Fetal Standing to Sue.
Fox D; Adashi EY; Cohen IG
JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):23-24. PubMed ID: 31116380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
Smith PA
Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HIPAA, Privacy, and Reproductive Rights in a Post-Roe Era.
Shachar C
JAMA; 2022 Aug; 328(5):417-418. PubMed ID: 35838680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
Warren MA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change?
Joyce T
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
Siano JR
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Lesbians and abortion.
Robson R
Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond personhood and autonomy: moral theory and the premises of privacy.
Rappaport AJ
Utah Law Rev; 2001; 2001(2):441-507. PubMed ID: 16538746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade.
Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Technology and the legal discourse of fetal autonomy.
Morris C
UCLA Womens Law J; 1997; 8(1):47-97. PubMed ID: 16273687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture?
Callahan J
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right's reasons: constitutional conflict and the spread of woman-protective antiabortion argument.
Siegel RB
Duke Law J; 2008 Apr; 57(6):1641-92. PubMed ID: 19108356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
Davis PC; Gilligan C
McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
