138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31116386)
1. Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol.
Pujol A; Zamora MJ; Obradors A; Garcia D; Rodriguez A; Vassena R
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):989-997. PubMed ID: 31116386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cumulative pregnancy rates of two strategies: Day 3 fresh embryo transfer followed by Day 3 or Day 5/6 vitrification and embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mengels A; Van Muylder A; Peeraer K; Luyten J; Laenen A; Spiessens C; Debrock S
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 37886820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Universal Warming" protocol for vitrified oocytes to streamline cell exchange for transnational donation programs: a multi-center study.
Parmegiani L; Minasi MG; Arnone A; Casciani V; Cognigni GE; Viñoles R; Varricchio MT; Quintero LA; Greco E; Filicori M
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jun; 37(6):1379-1385. PubMed ID: 32363563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Embryos from vitrified vs. fresh oocytes in an oocyte donation program: a comparative morphokinetic analysis.
Karagianni M; Papadopoulou MI; Oraiopoulou C; Christoforidis N; Papatheodorou A; Chatziparasidou A
F S Sci; 2024 May; 5(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 38580180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative analysis of the clinical pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between oocyte vitrification and embryo vitrification based on the propensity score matching method.
Du S; Shen C; Zhang J
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Apr; 41(4):875-883. PubMed ID: 38366240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of reproductive outcomes of fresh versus cryopreserved ejaculated sperm samples-a retrospective analysis of 44 423 oocyte donation ICSI cycles.
Gil Juliá M; Cozzolino M; Navarro-Gomezlechon A; Hervas I; Mossetti L; Pacheco-Rendón RM; Rivera-Egea R; Garrido N
Hum Reprod; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38723190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Similar pregnancy outcomes from fresh and frozen donor oocytes transferred to gestational carriers: a SART database analysis isolating the effects of oocyte vitrification.
Kloos J; Burks C; Purdue-Smithe A; DeVilbiss E; Mumford SL; Weinerman R
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Mar; 41(3):643-648. PubMed ID: 38200285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal timing for elective egg freezing.
Mesen TB; Mersereau JE; Kane JB; Steiner AZ
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1551-6.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25881876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First pregnancy and live birth from ex vivo-retrieved metaphase II oocytes from a woman with bilateral ovarian carcinoma: a case report.
de Carvalho BR; Cintra GF; Cabral ÍO; Franceschi TM; Resende LSA; Huguenin JFL; Barros ATOS
Fertil Steril; 2024 Jun; 121(6):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 38316207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Random-start ovarian stimulation in an oocyte donation programme: a large, single-centre, experience.
Guerrero J; Castillo JC; Ten J; Ortiz JA; Lledó B; Orozco D; Quereda F; Bernabeu A; Bernabeu R
Reprod Biomed Online; 2024 Jan; 48(1):103572. PubMed ID: 37979227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicted probabilities of live birth following assisted reproductive technology using United States national surveillance data from 2016 to 2018.
Gaskins AJ; Zhang Y; Chang J; Kissin DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5):557.e1-557.e10. PubMed ID: 36702210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reassessing the impact of letrozole co-administration in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: findings from a single-center repeated measures study.
Jain NS; Licciardi F; Kalluru S; McCulloh DH; Blakemore JK
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Apr; 41(4):979-987. PubMed ID: 38381391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Autologous oocyte cryopreservation in women aged 40 and older using minimal stimulation IVF.
Zhang JJ; Choo S; Yang M
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2015 Oct; 13():112. PubMed ID: 26444973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Open and Closed Oocyte Vitrification Systems on Embryo Development: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Pantos K; Maziotis E; Trypidi A; Grigoriadis S; Agapitou K; Pantou A; Nikolettos K; Kokkini G; Sfakianoudis K; Pomeroy KO; Simopoulou M
J Clin Med; 2024 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 38731179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of medico-administrative databases to health vigilance: example of post-oocyte retrieval infections.
Lemardeley G; Porcu-Buisson G; Pirrello O; Gane J; Dieterlé S; Astrugue C; Charbonnier T; Lucas-Samuel S; Couchoud C
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):190-200. PubMed ID: 37953342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation.
Cil AP; Seli E
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 25(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 23562954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metabolic imaging of human cumulus cells reveals associations with pregnancy and live birth.
Venturas M; Racowsky C; Needleman DJ
Hum Reprod; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38719791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000-2010.
Kawwass JF; Monsour M; Crawford S; Kissin DM; Session DR; Kulkarni AD; Jamieson DJ;
JAMA; 2013 Dec; 310(22):2426-34. PubMed ID: 24135860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Live birth from slow-frozen rabbit oocytes after in vivo fertilisation.
Jiménez-Trigos E; Vicente JS; Marco-Jiménez F
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83399. PubMed ID: 24358281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
