393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31117509)
1. Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening.
Ebejer JP; Finn PW; Wong WK; Deane CM; Morris GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2600-2616. PubMed ID: 31117509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel inhibitor discovery through virtual screening against multiple protein conformations generated via ligand-directed modeling: a maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase example.
Mahasenan KV; Li C
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1345-55. PubMed ID: 22540736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving Protein-Ligand Docking Results with High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Guterres H; Im W
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Apr; 60(4):2189-2198. PubMed ID: 32227880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ligand-based virtual screening approach using a new scoring function.
Hamza A; Wei NN; Zhan CG
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):963-74. PubMed ID: 22486340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PoLi: A Virtual Screening Pipeline Based on Template Pocket and Ligand Similarity.
Roy A; Srinivasan B; Skolnick J
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1757-70. PubMed ID: 26225536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrostatic-field and surface-shape similarity for virtual screening and pose prediction.
Cleves AE; Johnson SR; Jain AN
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Oct; 33(10):865-886. PubMed ID: 31650386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benchmarking of HPCC: A novel 3D molecular representation combining shape and pharmacophoric descriptors for efficient molecular similarity assessments.
Karaboga AS; Petronin F; Marchetti G; Souchet M; Maigret B
J Mol Graph Model; 2013 Apr; 41():20-30. PubMed ID: 23467019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AutoDock-SS: AutoDock for Multiconformational Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.
Ni B; Wang H; Khalaf HKS; Blay V; Houston DR
J Chem Inf Model; 2024 May; 64(9):3779-3789. PubMed ID: 38624083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SimG: an alignment based method for evaluating the similarity of small molecules and binding sites.
Cai C; Gong J; Liu X; Gao D; Li H
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):2103-15. PubMed ID: 23889471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
Kumar SP
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.
Hsieh JH; Yin S; Wang XS; Liu S; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 22017385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Template-Based Method for Conformation Generation and Scoring for Congeneric Series of Ligands.
Raman EP
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2690-2701. PubMed ID: 31045363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recipes for the selection of experimental protein conformations for virtual screening.
Rueda M; Bottegoni G; Abagyan R
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jan; 50(1):186-93. PubMed ID: 20000587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of compound ranking for structure-based virtual ligand screening using an established FRED-Surflex consensus approach.
Du J; Bleylevens IW; Bitorina AV; Wichapong K; Nicolaes GA
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2014 Jan; 83(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 23941463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benchmark of four popular virtual screening programs: construction of the active/decoy dataset remains a major determinant of measured performance.
Chaput L; Martinez-Sanz J; Saettel N; Mouawad L
J Cheminform; 2016; 8():56. PubMed ID: 27803745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ALiBERO: evolving a team of complementary pocket conformations rather than a single leader.
Rueda M; Totrov M; Abagyan R
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2705-14. PubMed ID: 22947092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
