194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31118141)
1. Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Cohen PA; Powell A; Böhm S; Gilks CB; Stewart CJR; Meniawy TM; Bulsara M; Avril S; Brockbank EC; Bosse T; de Azevedo Focchi GR; Ganesan R; Glasspool RM; Howitt BE; Kim HS; Lee JY; Le ND; Lockley M; Manchanda R; Mandalia T; McCluggage WG; McNeish I; Midha D; Srinivasan R; Tan YY; van der Griend R; Yunokawa M; Zannoni GF; ; Singh N
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 31118141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation of chemotherapy response score system for histopathological assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.
Lee JY; Chung YS; Na K; Kim HM; Park CK; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT; Kim HS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e73. PubMed ID: 28758379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 3-Tier Chemotherapy Response Score for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma: Is it Clinically Relevant?
Lawson BC; Euscher ED; Bassett RL; Liu J; Ramalingam P; Zhong Y; Fleming ND; Malpica A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44(2):206-213. PubMed ID: 31651523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.
Böhm S; Faruqi A; Said I; Lockley M; Brockbank E; Jeyarajah A; Fitzpatrick A; Ennis D; Dowe T; Santos JL; Cook LS; Tinker AV; Le ND; Gilks CB; Singh N
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(22):2457-63. PubMed ID: 26124480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Role of Histological Tumor Regression in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Grade Serous Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma.
Coghlan E; Meniawy TM; Munro A; Bulsara M; Stewart CJ; Tan A; Koay MHE; MaGee D; Codde J; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Leung Y; Nichols CB; Cohen PA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 28441251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Ki-67 Labeling Index on Prognostic Significance of the Chemotherapy Response Score in Women With Tubo-ovarian Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Heayn M; Skvarca LB; Zhu L; Edwards RP; Olawaiye AB; Modugno F; Elishaev E; Bhargava R
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2021 May; 40(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 32897953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of a 'response score' after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with complete clinical response.
Zorzato PC; Zannoni GF; Tudisco R; Pasciuto T; Di Giorgio A; Franchi M; Scambia G; Fagotti A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 31754067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic implications of histological tumor regression (Böhm's score) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade serous tubal & ovarian carcinoma.
Rajkumar S; Polson A; Nath R; Lane G; Sayasneh A; Jakes A; Begum S; Mehra G
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 151(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 30197060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The chemotherapy response score is a useful histological predictor of prognosis in high-grade serous carcinoma.
Singh P; Kaushal V; Rai B; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Dey P; Garg R; Rohilla M; Suri V; Ghoshal S; Srinivasan R
Histopathology; 2018 Mar; 72(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 28914967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers: pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials.
Vergote I; Coens C; Nankivell M; Kristensen GB; Parmar MKB; Ehlen T; Jayson GC; Johnson N; Swart AM; Verheijen R; McCluggage WG; Perren T; Panici PB; Kenter G; Casado A; Mendiola C; Stuart G; Reed NS; Kehoe S; ;
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1680-1687. PubMed ID: 30413383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy: evaluation of chemotherapy response score and serological and/or radiological assessment of response in ovarian cancer patients.
Ramspott JP; Baert T; MacKintosh ML; Traut A; Ataseven B; Bommert M; Heitz F; Plett H; Schneider S; Waltering KU; Heikaus S; Harter P; du Bois A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 304(4):1021-1032. PubMed ID: 33661392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) Assessed on the Adnexa in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Santoro A; Travaglino A; Inzani F; Straccia P; Arciuolo D; Valente M; D'Alessandris N; Scaglione G; Angelico G; Piermattei A; Cianfrini F; Raffone A; Zannoni GF
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35328186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Liontos M; Andrikopoulou A; Koutsoukos K; Markellos C; Skafida E; Fiste O; Kaparelou M; Thomakos N; Haidopoulos D; Rodolakis A; Dimopoulos MA; Zagouri F
J Ovarian Res; 2021 Nov; 14(1):148. PubMed ID: 34724958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a prognostic biomarker in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: updated Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) results.
Böhm S; Le N; Lockley M; Brockbank E; Faruqi A; Said I; Jeyarajah A; Wuntakal R; Gilks B; Singh N
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Feb; 29(2):353-356. PubMed ID: 30683759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association of Somatic Mutations of ADAMTS Genes With Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Survival in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.
Liu Y; Yasukawa M; Chen K; Hu L; Broaddus RR; Ding L; Mardis ER; Spellman P; Levine DA; Mills GB; Shmulevich I; Sood AK; Zhang W
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Jul; 1(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 26181259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PD-L1 Expression and CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Different Types of Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma and Their Prognostic Value in High-grade Serous Carcinoma.
Chen H; Molberg K; Strickland AL; Castrillon DH; Carrick K; Jiang Q; Niu S; Rivera-Colon G; Gwin K; Hinson S; Lea J; Miller DS; Zheng W; Lucas E
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Aug; 44(8):1050-1060. PubMed ID: 32384321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective responses to first-line neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel regimens for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (ICON8): post-hoc exploratory analysis of a randomised, phase 3 trial.
Morgan RD; McNeish IA; Cook AD; James EC; Lord R; Dark G; Glasspool RM; Krell J; Parkinson C; Poole CJ; Hall M; Gallardo-Rincón D; Lockley M; Essapen S; Summers J; Anand A; Zachariah A; Williams S; Jones R; Scatchard K; Walther A; Kim JW; Sundar S; Jayson GC; Ledermann JA; Clamp AR
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Feb; 22(2):277-288. PubMed ID: 33357510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Poor performance status (PS) is an indication for an aggressive approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
Seifert H; Georgiou A; Alexander H; McLachlan J; Bodla S; Kaye S; Barton D; Nobbenhuis M; Gore M; Banerjee S
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 26318078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Olaparib combined with chemotherapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 trial.
Oza AM; Cibula D; Benzaquen AO; Poole C; Mathijssen RH; Sonke GS; Colombo N; Špaček J; Vuylsteke P; Hirte H; Mahner S; Plante M; Schmalfeldt B; Mackay H; Rowbottom J; Lowe ES; Dougherty B; Barrett JC; Friedlander M
Lancet Oncol; 2015 Jan; 16(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 25481791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chemotherapy response score as a prognostic tool in patients with advanced stage endometrial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Jani I; Lastra RR; Brito KS; Liao C; Lazo I; Lee NK; Yamada SD; Kurnit KC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jun; 31(6):852-858. PubMed ID: 33833085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
