These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31118141)
1. Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Cohen PA; Powell A; Böhm S; Gilks CB; Stewart CJR; Meniawy TM; Bulsara M; Avril S; Brockbank EC; Bosse T; de Azevedo Focchi GR; Ganesan R; Glasspool RM; Howitt BE; Kim HS; Lee JY; Le ND; Lockley M; Manchanda R; Mandalia T; McCluggage WG; McNeish I; Midha D; Srinivasan R; Tan YY; van der Griend R; Yunokawa M; Zannoni GF; ; Singh N Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 31118141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation of chemotherapy response score system for histopathological assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Lee JY; Chung YS; Na K; Kim HM; Park CK; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT; Kim HS J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e73. PubMed ID: 28758379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 3-Tier Chemotherapy Response Score for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma: Is it Clinically Relevant? Lawson BC; Euscher ED; Bassett RL; Liu J; Ramalingam P; Zhong Y; Fleming ND; Malpica A Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44(2):206-213. PubMed ID: 31651523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma. Böhm S; Faruqi A; Said I; Lockley M; Brockbank E; Jeyarajah A; Fitzpatrick A; Ennis D; Dowe T; Santos JL; Cook LS; Tinker AV; Le ND; Gilks CB; Singh N J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(22):2457-63. PubMed ID: 26124480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Role of Histological Tumor Regression in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Grade Serous Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma. Coghlan E; Meniawy TM; Munro A; Bulsara M; Stewart CJ; Tan A; Koay MHE; MaGee D; Codde J; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Leung Y; Nichols CB; Cohen PA Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 28441251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Ki-67 Labeling Index on Prognostic Significance of the Chemotherapy Response Score in Women With Tubo-ovarian Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Heayn M; Skvarca LB; Zhu L; Edwards RP; Olawaiye AB; Modugno F; Elishaev E; Bhargava R Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2021 May; 40(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 32897953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of a 'response score' after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with complete clinical response. Zorzato PC; Zannoni GF; Tudisco R; Pasciuto T; Di Giorgio A; Franchi M; Scambia G; Fagotti A Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 31754067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic implications of histological tumor regression (Böhm's score) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade serous tubal & ovarian carcinoma. Rajkumar S; Polson A; Nath R; Lane G; Sayasneh A; Jakes A; Begum S; Mehra G Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 151(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 30197060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The chemotherapy response score is a useful histological predictor of prognosis in high-grade serous carcinoma. Singh P; Kaushal V; Rai B; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Dey P; Garg R; Rohilla M; Suri V; Ghoshal S; Srinivasan R Histopathology; 2018 Mar; 72(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 28914967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers: pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials. Vergote I; Coens C; Nankivell M; Kristensen GB; Parmar MKB; Ehlen T; Jayson GC; Johnson N; Swart AM; Verheijen R; McCluggage WG; Perren T; Panici PB; Kenter G; Casado A; Mendiola C; Stuart G; Reed NS; Kehoe S; ; Lancet Oncol; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1680-1687. PubMed ID: 30413383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy: evaluation of chemotherapy response score and serological and/or radiological assessment of response in ovarian cancer patients. Ramspott JP; Baert T; MacKintosh ML; Traut A; Ataseven B; Bommert M; Heitz F; Plett H; Schneider S; Waltering KU; Heikaus S; Harter P; du Bois A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 304(4):1021-1032. PubMed ID: 33661392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) Assessed on the Adnexa in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Santoro A; Travaglino A; Inzani F; Straccia P; Arciuolo D; Valente M; D'Alessandris N; Scaglione G; Angelico G; Piermattei A; Cianfrini F; Raffone A; Zannoni GF Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35328186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlating the KELIM (CA125 elimination rate constant K) score and the chemo-response score as predictors of chemosensitivity in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Piedimonte S; Murray C; Atenafu EG; Rouzbahman M; Lheureux S; May T Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Aug; 187():92-97. PubMed ID: 38735145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Liontos M; Andrikopoulou A; Koutsoukos K; Markellos C; Skafida E; Fiste O; Kaparelou M; Thomakos N; Haidopoulos D; Rodolakis A; Dimopoulos MA; Zagouri F J Ovarian Res; 2021 Nov; 14(1):148. PubMed ID: 34724958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a prognostic biomarker in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: updated Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) results. Böhm S; Le N; Lockley M; Brockbank E; Faruqi A; Said I; Jeyarajah A; Wuntakal R; Gilks B; Singh N Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Feb; 29(2):353-356. PubMed ID: 30683759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of Somatic Mutations of ADAMTS Genes With Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Survival in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Liu Y; Yasukawa M; Chen K; Hu L; Broaddus RR; Ding L; Mardis ER; Spellman P; Levine DA; Mills GB; Shmulevich I; Sood AK; Zhang W JAMA Oncol; 2015 Jul; 1(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 26181259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PD-L1 Expression and CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Different Types of Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma and Their Prognostic Value in High-grade Serous Carcinoma. Chen H; Molberg K; Strickland AL; Castrillon DH; Carrick K; Jiang Q; Niu S; Rivera-Colon G; Gwin K; Hinson S; Lea J; Miller DS; Zheng W; Lucas E Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Aug; 44(8):1050-1060. PubMed ID: 32384321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective responses to first-line neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel regimens for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (ICON8): post-hoc exploratory analysis of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Morgan RD; McNeish IA; Cook AD; James EC; Lord R; Dark G; Glasspool RM; Krell J; Parkinson C; Poole CJ; Hall M; Gallardo-Rincón D; Lockley M; Essapen S; Summers J; Anand A; Zachariah A; Williams S; Jones R; Scatchard K; Walther A; Kim JW; Sundar S; Jayson GC; Ledermann JA; Clamp AR Lancet Oncol; 2021 Feb; 22(2):277-288. PubMed ID: 33357510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Poor performance status (PS) is an indication for an aggressive approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Seifert H; Georgiou A; Alexander H; McLachlan J; Bodla S; Kaye S; Barton D; Nobbenhuis M; Gore M; Banerjee S Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 26318078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]