142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31119909)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of interlimb differences of ultrasonographic subcutaneous tissue thickness measurements in breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
Giray E; Yagci I
Lymphology; 2019; 52(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 31119909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Measures Considering Segmental Tissue Composition and Volume Changes of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Yang EJ; Kim SY; Lee WH; Lim JY; Lee J
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Aug; 16(4):368-376. PubMed ID: 29338541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Subcutaneous Echogenicity Grade and Subcutaneous Echo-Free Space Grade in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Giray E; Yağcı İ
Lymphat Res Biol; 2019 Oct; 17(5):518-524. PubMed ID: 30570358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Contribution of Ultrasonography in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Erdinç Gündüz N; Dilek B; Şahin E; Ellidokuz H; Akalın E
Lymphat Res Biol; 2021 Dec; 19(6):517-523. PubMed ID: 33601960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal Cut-Off Value for Detecting Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Using Ultrasonography.
Yeo SM; Kim TK; Park SH; Lee CH
Lymphat Res Biol; 2024 Feb; 22(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 37971868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of the Presence of Fluid Accumulation in the Subcutaneous Tissue in BCRL Using Texture Analysis of Ultrasound Images.
Niwa S; Mawaki A; Hisano F; Nakanishi K; Watanabe S; Fukuyama A; Kikumori T; Shimamoto K; Fujimoto E; Oshima C
Lymphat Res Biol; 2022 Feb; 20(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 33625885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Perioperative variations in indices derived from noninvasive assessments to detect postmastectomy lymphedema.
Suehiro K; Yamamoto S; Honda S; Morikage N; Harada E; Takemoto Y; Nagano H; Hamano K
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2019 Jul; 7(4):562-569. PubMed ID: 31203860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of complex decongestive physiotherapy applied with different compression pressures on skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness in individuals with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a double-blinded randomized comparison trial.
Duygu-Yildiz E; Bakar Y; Hizal M
Support Care Cancer; 2023 Jun; 31(7):383. PubMed ID: 37285046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-frequency ultrasound examination of skin and subcutis thickness in breast cancer-related lymphedema.
Mellor RH; Bush NL; Stanton AW; Bamber JC; Levick JR; Mortimer PS
Breast J; 2004; 10(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 15569205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postmastectomy lymphoedema: different patterns of fluid distribution visualised by ultrasound imaging compared with magnetic resonance imaging.
Tassenoy A; De Mey J; De Ridder F; Van Schuerbeeck P; Vanderhasselt T; Lamote J; Lievens P
Physiotherapy; 2011 Sep; 97(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 21820542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumference-Based Criteria for Detection of Secondary Arm Lymphedema for Chinese Women.
Wang H; Shen L; Liu T; Shao P; Dylke ES; Jia J; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2017 Sep; 15(3):262-267. PubMed ID: 28749717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of Elastography in Diagnosis and Staging of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Erdogan Iyigun Z; Agacayak F; Ilgun AS; Elbuken Celebi F; Ordu C; Alco G; Ozturk A; Duymaz T; Aktepe F; Ozmen V
Lymphat Res Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(3):334-339. PubMed ID: 30212266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Effects of Progressive Resistive Exercise in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Bok SK; Jeon Y; Hwang PS
Lymphat Res Biol; 2016 Mar; 14(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 26824517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Polat AV; Ozturk M; Polat AK; Karabacak U; Bekci T; Murat N
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Apr; 39(4):795-803. PubMed ID: 31705687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and Diagnostic Thresholds for Ultrasound Measurements of Dermal Thickness in Breast Lymphedema.
Dylke ES; Benincasa Nakagawa H; Lin L; Clarke JL; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Jun; 16(3):258-262. PubMed ID: 28759331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Clinical Usefulness of Lymphedema Measurement Technique Using Ultrasound.
Kim SY; Lee CH; Heo SJ; Moon MH
Lymphat Res Biol; 2021 Aug; 19(4):340-346. PubMed ID: 33404351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Easy Volumeter in Detection of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Validity Study.
Engin O; Akalın E; Sarıbay E; Aslan C; Şahin E; Alper S
Lymphat Res Biol; 2019 Oct; 17(5):543-549. PubMed ID: 30735097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema.
Jeon Y; Beom J; Ahn S; Bok SK
J Vis Exp; 2017 Jan; (119):. PubMed ID: 28117779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Palpation of Increased Skin and Subcutaneous Thickness, Tissue Dielectric Constant, and Water Displacement Method for Diagnosis of Early Mild Arm Lymphedema.
Karlsson K; Nilsson-Wikmar L; Brogårdh C; Johansson K
Lymphat Res Biol; 2020 Jun; 18(3):219-225. PubMed ID: 31596662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioimpedance spectroscopy is not associated with a clinical diagnosis of breast cancer-related lymphedema.
Spitz JA; Chao AH; Peterson DM; Subramaniam V; Prakash S; Skoracki RJ
Lymphology; 2019; 52(3):134-142. PubMed ID: 31874125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
