191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31120005)
1. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Mohammadpanah M; Ayatollahi Mehrgardi A; Gilbert H; Larzul C; Mercat MJ; Esmailizadeh A; Momen M; Tusell L
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3795. PubMed ID: 35264636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal definition of contemporary groups for crossbred pigs in a joint purebred and crossbred genetic evaluation.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DA; Chen CY; Valente BD; Holl J; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33313883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.
Srihi H; Noguera JL; Topayan V; Martín de Hijas M; Ibañez-Escriche N; Casellas J; Vázquez-Gómez M; Martínez-Castillero M; Rosas JP; Varona L
Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine.
Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the impact of non-additive genetic effects in the estimation of variance components and genomic predictions for heat tolerance and performance traits in crossbred and purebred pig populations.
de Oliveira LF; Brito LF; Marques DBD; da Silva DA; Lopes PS; Dos Santos CG; Johnson JS; Veroneze R
BMC Genom Data; 2023 Dec; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 38093199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.
Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 11811453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of non-additive genetic effects on carcass and meat quality traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using genomic models.
Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Lee DH; Chung Y; Lee DJ; Kang JM; Lee SH
Animal; 2024 May; 18(5):101152. PubMed ID: 38701710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of dominance variance for live body weight in a crossbred population of pigs.
Dufrasne M; Faux P; Piedboeuf M; Wavreille J; Gengler N
J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4313-8. PubMed ID: 25149333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic parameters of meat quality, carcass composition, and growth traits in commercial swine.
Khanal P; Maltecca C; Schwab C; Gray K; Tiezzi F
J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3669-3683. PubMed ID: 31350997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits.
Wei M; van der Werf JH
J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genome-wide association study for carcass quality traits and growth in purebred and crossbred pigs1.
Bergamaschi M; Maltecca C; Fix J; Schwab C; Tiezzi F
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31768540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
