238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31120104)
1. Data Resource Profile: National Cancer Registration Dataset in England.
Henson KE; Elliss-Brookes L; Coupland VH; Payne E; Vernon S; Rous B; Rashbass J
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 49(1):16-16h. PubMed ID: 31120104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Data Resource Profile: The New Zealand Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI).
Milne BJ; Atkinson J; Blakely T; Day H; Douwes J; Gibb S; Nicolson M; Shackleton N; Sporle A; Teng A
Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 48(3):677-677e. PubMed ID: 30793742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and progress of the National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service.
Stevens S; Miller N; Rashbass J
Arch Dis Child; 2018 Mar; 103(3):215-217. PubMed ID: 29066522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of improved data collection on breast cancer incidence and survival: reconciliation of a registry with a clinical database.
Stotter A; Bright N; Silcocks PB; Botha JL
BMJ; 2000 Jul; 321(7255):214. PubMed ID: 10903654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Data Resource Profile: The Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy (SACT) dataset.
Bright CJ; Lawton S; Benson S; Bomb M; Dodwell D; Henson KE; McPhail S; Miller L; Rashbass J; Turnbull A; Smittenaar R
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 49(1):15-15l. PubMed ID: 31340008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Availability and completeness of cancer registration worldwide.
Shanmugaratnam K
Recent Results Cancer Res; 1989; 114():28-33. PubMed ID: 2813942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the comparability of cancer registry treatment data and proposals for a new national minimum dataset.
Pheby DF; Etherington DJ
J Public Health Med; 1994 Sep; 16(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 7999387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cohort profile: Children in Need Census (CIN) records of children referred for social care support in England.
Emmott EH; Jay MA; Woodman J
BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e023771. PubMed ID: 30798306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer data collection for surgical audit.
Woods WG; Earlam RJ
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1991 Nov; 73(6):364-71; discussion 372. PubMed ID: 1759766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of data quality for population-based cancer survival analysis.
Li R; Abela L; Moore J; Woods LM; Nur U; Rachet B; Allemani C; Coleman MP
Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 38(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 24685409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of local data on skin cancer. Inaccurate data may lead to insufficient resources.
Burnett AC; Bland P
BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6990):1327-8. PubMed ID: 7773055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Data Resource Profile: The National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).
Finney Rutten LJ; Blake KD; Skolnick VG; Davis T; Moser RP; Hesse BW
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 49(1):17-17j. PubMed ID: 31038687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Legal and practical issues regarding collection and disclosure of prognostic data in population-based cancer registries].
Tanaka H
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2006 Jun; 53(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16881527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The completeness of cancer registration in England: an assessment from the Oxford-FPA contraceptive study.
Villard-Mackintosh L; Coleman MP; Vessey MP
Br J Cancer; 1988 Oct; 58(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 3207607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Registering cancer.
Chamberlain J
Health Serv J; 1988 Jul; 98(5109):796-8. PubMed ID: 10288386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. We are what we eat--but what do we eat?--A role for coordination of cancer registration and dietary intake.
Moore MA; Tajima K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2004; 5(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 15373700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The potential and limitations of data from population-based state cancer registries.
Izquierdo JN; Schoenbach VJ
Am J Public Health; 2000 May; 90(5):695-8. PubMed ID: 10800415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assuring the quality of cancer registration in Rhode Island. Evaluation of early returns indicates future measures for enhancing reliability.
Fulton JP; Buechner JS; Stanis D; Raimondo M
R I Med J (1976); 1988 Sep; 71(9):337-46. PubMed ID: 3187325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a Quality Dashboard Utilizing Cancer Registry Data.
Bisel D
J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 29611902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
