184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31120280)
1. Using a dependent schedule to measure risky choice in male rats: Effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and methamphetamine.
Yates JR; Prior NA; Chitwood MR; Day HA; Heidel JR; Hopkins SE; Muncie BT; Paradella-Bradley TA; Sestito AP; Vecchiola AN; Wells EE
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2020 Apr; 28(2):181-195. PubMed ID: 31120280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pair housing, but not using a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure, attenuates the modulatory effect of probability presentation order on amphetamine-induced changes in risky choice.
Yates JR; Ellis AL; Evans KE; Kappesser JL; Lilly KM; Mbambu P; Sutphin TG
Behav Brain Res; 2020 Jul; 390():112669. PubMed ID: 32417278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methamphetamine increases risky choice in rats, but only when magnitude and probability of reinforcement are manipulated within a session.
Yates JR; Adhikari S; Bako RE; Berling KL; Broderick MR; Mains R; Zwick B
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2024 Jun; 239():173751. PubMed ID: 38548247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of 7-day continuous D-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and cocaine treatment on choice between methamphetamine and food in male rhesus monkeys.
Schwienteck KL; Banks ML
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2015 Oct; 155():16-23. PubMed ID: 26361713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impulsive choice and environmental enrichment: effects of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate.
Perry JL; Stairs DJ; Bardo MT
Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 18534693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-trial behavioral sensitization in preweanling rats: differential effects of cocaine, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, and D-amphetamine.
McDougall SA; Kozanian OO; Greenfield VY; Horn LR; Gutierrez A; Mohd-Yusof A; Castellanos KA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2011 Oct; 217(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 21537939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists impair discriminability of reinforcer magnitude, but not risky choice, in a probability-discounting task.
Yates JR; Chitwood MR; Evans KE; Kappesser JL; Murray CP; Paradella-Bradley TA; Torline BT
Behav Brain Res; 2019 Jun; 365():77-81. PubMed ID: 30831139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discriminative stimulus and subject-rated effects of methamphetamine, d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and triazolam in methamphetamine-trained humans.
Sevak RJ; Stoops WW; Hays LR; Rush CR
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2009 Mar; 328(3):1007-18. PubMed ID: 19104030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential effects of d-amphetamine and atomoxetine on risk-based decision making of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.
Ozga-Hess JE; Anderson KG
Behav Pharmacol; 2019 Oct; 30(7):605-616. PubMed ID: 31503070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on delay discounting in rats: interactions with order of delay presentation.
Tanno T; Maguire DR; Henson C; France CP
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2014 Jan; 231(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 23963529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neuronal development genes are key elements mediating the reinforcing effects of methamphetamine, amphetamine, and methylphenidate.
Dela Peña I; Jeon SJ; Lee E; Ryu JH; Shin CY; Noh M; Cheong JH
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Dec; 230(3):399-413. PubMed ID: 23783774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Behavioral and pharmacological variables affecting risky choice in rats.
Kaminski BJ; Ator NA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 May; 75(3):275-97. PubMed ID: 11453619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of d-amphetamine and MK-801 on impulsive choice: Modulation by schedule of reinforcement and delay length.
Yates JR; Day HA; Evans KE; Igwe HO; Kappesser JL; Miller AL; Murray CP; Torline BT; Ellis AL; Stacy WL
Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 376():112228. PubMed ID: 31520689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response requirement and increases in accuracy produced by stimulant drugs in a 5-choice serial reaction-time task in rats.
Koffarnus MN; Katz JL
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2011 Feb; 213(4):723-33. PubMed ID: 20924752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methylphenidate as a reinforcer for rats: contingent delivery and intake escalation.
Marusich JA; Beckmann JS; Gipson CD; Bardo MT
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Jun; 18(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 20545390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Choice in a variable environment: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement.
Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):460-4. PubMed ID: 20188157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of GluN2B-selective antagonists on delay and probability discounting in male rats: Modulation by delay/probability presentation order.
Yates JR; Prior NA; Chitwood MR; Day HA; Heidel JR; Hopkins SE; Muncie BT; Paradella-Bradley TA; Sestito AP; Vecchiola AN; Wells EE
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2018 Dec; 26(6):525-540. PubMed ID: 30035577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
Pitts RC; Febbo SM
Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of variable training, signaled and unsignaled delays, and d-amphetamine on delay-discounting functions.
Slezak JM; Anderson KG
Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 20(5-6):424-36. PubMed ID: 19730365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The dopamine reuptake inhibitor MRZ-9547 increases progressive ratio responding in rats.
Sommer S; Danysz W; Russ H; Valastro B; Flik G; Hauber W
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol; 2014 Dec; 17(12):2045-56. PubMed ID: 24964269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
