These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31120289)

  • 1. And the winner is . . . ? Forecasting the outcome of others' competitive efforts.
    Kupor D; Brucks MS; Huang SC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):500-521. PubMed ID: 31120289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting persons' versus a person's goodness: behavioral forecasts diverge for individuals versus populations.
    Critcher CR; Dunning D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Jan; 104(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 23163749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When individual goal pursuit turns competitive: How we sabotage and coast.
    Huang SC; Lin SC; Zhang Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):605-620. PubMed ID: 30667256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tell me who you are and I tell you how you feel: expected emotional reactions to success and failure are influenced by knowledge about a person's personality.
    Hareli S; Sharabi M; Hess U
    Int J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 46(4):310-20. PubMed ID: 22044274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personal relative deprivation and the belief that economic success is zero-sum.
    Ongis M; Davidai S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jul; 151(7):1666-1680. PubMed ID: 34843365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The streaking star effect: Why people want superior performance by individuals to continue more than identical performance by groups.
    Walker J; Gilovich T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Mar; 120(3):559-575. PubMed ID: 32790471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychology of negative-sum competition in strategic interactions.
    Hsee CK; Zeng Y; Li X; Imas A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Oct; 125(4):720-729. PubMed ID: 37439714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When and why people misestimate future feelings: Identifying strengths and weaknesses in affective forecasting.
    Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez K; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Bench SW; Wan Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 May; 116(5):724-742. PubMed ID: 30604985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The redundancy in cumulative information and how it biases impressions.
    Alves H; Mata A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Dec; 117(6):1035-1060. PubMed ID: 31219290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forecasting the duration of emotions: A motivational account and self-other differences.
    Mata A; Simão C; Farias AR; Steimer A
    Emotion; 2019 Apr; 19(3):503-519. PubMed ID: 29999381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ideomotor action in cooperative and competitive settings.
    Häberle A; Schütz-Bosbach S; Laboissière R; Prinz W
    Soc Neurosci; 2008; 3(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 18633844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning about and from others' prudence, impatience or laziness: The computational bases of attitude alignment.
    Devaine M; Daunizeau J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Mar; 13(3):e1005422. PubMed ID: 28358869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact bias in self and others: Affective and empathic forecasting in individuals with social anxiety.
    Arditte Hall KA; Joormann J; Siemer M; Timpano KR
    Behav Res Ther; 2018 Jul; 106():37-46. PubMed ID: 29758391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding intentional actions from observers' viewpoints: A social neuroscience perspective.
    Isoda M
    Neurosci Res; 2016 Nov; 112():1-9. PubMed ID: 27393254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias and asymmetric loss in expert forecasts: a study of physician prognostic behavior with respect to patient survival.
    Alexander M; Christakis NA
    J Health Econ; 2008 Jul; 27(4):1095-1108. PubMed ID: 18539349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revising probability estimates: Why increasing likelihood means increasing impact.
    Maglio SJ; Polman E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Aug; 111(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 27281350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overcorrection for Social-Categorization Information Moderates Impact Bias in Affective Forecasting.
    Lau T; Morewedge CK; Cikara M
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1340-1351. PubMed ID: 27538410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others' behavior.
    Genschow O; Rigoni D; Brass M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(38):10071-10076. PubMed ID: 28855342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social rank: implications for consumers as actors and observers.
    Rucker DD
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2020 Jun; 33():57-61. PubMed ID: 31398538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On making forecasts from binary sequences: Uncovering implicit cues.
    Beckstead JW; Pezzo MV
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):466-483. PubMed ID: 32852979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.