These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Measurement of polyp size at colonoscopy: a proof-of-concept simulation study to address technology bias. Sakata S; McIvor F; Klein K; Stevenson ARL; Hewett DG Gut; 2018 Feb; 67(2):206-208. PubMed ID: 27697826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement Bias of Polyp Size at Colonoscopy. Sakata S; Klein K; Stevenson ARL; Hewett DG Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Sep; 60(9):987-991. PubMed ID: 28796738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate Classification of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using Computer-Aided Analysis. Chen PJ; Lin MC; Lai MJ; Lin JC; Lu HH; Tseng VS Gastroenterology; 2018 Feb; 154(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 29042219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of the SIMPLE endoscopic classification of diminutive and small colorectal polyps. Iacucci M; Trovato C; Daperno M; Akinola O; Greenwald D; Gross SA; Hoffman A; Lee J; Lethebe BC; Lowerison M; Nayor J; Neumann H; Rath T; Sanduleanu S; Sharma P; Kiesslich R; Ghosh S; Saltzman JR; Endoscopy; 2018 Aug; 50(8):779-789. PubMed ID: 29571175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of colorectal adenomatous polyp size measured during pathological examination highlights the importance of accuracy. Hayes SJ Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):540-1. PubMed ID: 19555943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Back-to-back colon capsule endoscopy and optical colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening individuals. Kobaek-Larsen M; Kroijer R; Dyrvig AK; Buijs MM; Steele RJC; Qvist N; Baatrup G Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jun; 20(6):479-485. PubMed ID: 29166546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size? Kim JH; Park SJ; Lee JH; Kim TO; Kim HJ; Kim HW; Lee SH; Baek DH; Bigs BU World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 22(11):3220-6. PubMed ID: 27003999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility and accuracy of visual estimation of polyp size in large colorectal polyps. Buijs MM; Steele RJC; Buch N; Kolbro T; Zimmermann-Nielsen E; Kobaek-Larsen M; Baatrup G Acta Oncol; 2019; 58(sup1):S37-S41. PubMed ID: 30897992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice: the Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD 2) study. Rees CJ; Rajasekhar PT; Wilson A; Close H; Rutter MD; Saunders BP; East JE; Maier R; Moorghen M; Muhammad U; Hancock H; Jayaprakash A; MacDonald C; Ramadas A; Dhar A; Mason JM Gut; 2017 May; 66(5):887-895. PubMed ID: 27196576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic overestimation of colorectal polyp size. Anderson BW; Smyrk TC; Anderson KS; Mahoney DW; Devens ME; Sweetser SR; Kisiel JB; Ahlquist DA Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 26318830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety of cold polypectomy for small colorectal neoplastic lesions: a prospective cohort study in Japan. Shimodate Y; Mizuno M; Takezawa R; Kobayashi M; Yamazaki T; Doi A; Nishimura N; Mouri H; Matsueda K; Yamamoto H Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Sep; 32(9):1261-1266. PubMed ID: 28730368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scope or scalpel? A matched study of the treatment of large colorectal polyps. Church J; Erkan A ANZ J Surg; 2018 Mar; 88(3):177-181. PubMed ID: 27491016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic yield of the Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification for endoscopic diagnosis of superficial colorectal neoplasms in a large-scale clinical practice database. Kobayashi S; Yamada M; Takamaru H; Sakamoto T; Matsuda T; Sekine S; Igarashi Y; Saito Y United European Gastroenterol J; 2019 Aug; 7(7):914-923. PubMed ID: 31428416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variable interpretation of polyp size by using open forceps by experienced colonoscopists. Rex DK; Rabinovitz R Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 24119506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing Prevalence of Polyps > 9 mm in Young Adults Aged 40 to 59 Years Undergoing Colonoscopy From 2002 to 2014. Yip B; Holub J; Lieberman D Gastroenterology; 2021 Apr; 160(5):1863-1865.e1. PubMed ID: 33421518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of diminutive colorectal polyps. Matsuda T; Kawano H; Hisabe T; Ikematsu H; Kobayashi N; Mizuno K; Oka S; Takeuchi Y; Tamai N; Uraoka T; Hewett D; Chiu HM Dig Endosc; 2014 Apr; 26 Suppl 2():104-8. PubMed ID: 24750158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural history of diminutive colorectal polyps: long-term prospective observation by colonoscopy. Mizuno K; Suzuki Y; Takeuchi M; Kobayashi M; Aoyagi Y Dig Endosc; 2014 Apr; 26 Suppl 2():84-9. PubMed ID: 24750155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician assessment and management of complex colon polyps: a multicenter video-based survey study. Aziz Aadam A; Wani S; Kahi C; Kaltenbach T; Oh Y; Edmundowicz S; Peng J; Rademaker A; Patel S; Kushnir V; Venu M; Soetikno R; Keswani RN Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Sep; 109(9):1312-24. PubMed ID: 25001256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]