BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31120948)

  • 1. Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics.
    Nuthmann A; de Groot F; Huettig F; Olivers CNL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217051. PubMed ID: 31120948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fixation-related Brain Potentials during Semantic Integration of Object-Scene Information.
    Coco MI; Nuthmann A; Dimigen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):571-589. PubMed ID: 31765602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1742-53. PubMed ID: 21607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification.
    Henderson JM; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Aug; 13(3):449-63. PubMed ID: 2958593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming.
    Morgan JL; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):428-42. PubMed ID: 15910129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extra-foveal Processing of Object Semantics Guides Early Overt Attention During Visual Search.
    Cimminella F; Sala SD; Coco MI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):655-670. PubMed ID: 31792893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object-scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior.
    Cornelissen TH; Võ ML
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):154-168. PubMed ID: 27645215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying objects across saccades: effects of extrafoveal preview and flanker object context.
    Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 May; 18(3):521-30. PubMed ID: 1534353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects and preview benefits in reading: Evidence from Fixation Related Potentials.
    López-Peréz PJ; Dampuré J; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Barber HA
    Brain Lang; 2016 Nov; 162():29-34. PubMed ID: 27513878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes.
    Wu CC; Wang HC; Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():10-20. PubMed ID: 25199610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Associating peripheral and foveal visual input across saccades: a default mode of the human visual system?
    Weiß K; Schneider WX; Herwig A
    J Vis; 2014 Sep; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 25205780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrusive effects of semantic information on visual selective attention.
    Malcolm GL; Rattinger M; Shomstein S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2066-78. PubMed ID: 27381630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects.
    Malpass D; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):523-37. PubMed ID: 20192547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The elephant in the room: Inconsistency in scene viewing and representation.
    Spotorno S; Tatler BW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1717-1743. PubMed ID: 28967780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition.
    Jordan TR; Fuggetta G; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e23957. PubMed ID: 21935368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The functional arrangement of objects biases gaze direction.
    Clement A; O'Donnell RE; Brockmole JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 31044360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A foveal target increases catch-up saccade frequency during smooth pursuit.
    Heinen SJ; Potapchuk E; Watamaniuk SN
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Mar; 115(3):1220-7. PubMed ID: 26631148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-driven visual exploration at the foveal scale.
    Shelchkova N; Tang C; Poletti M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(12):5811-5818. PubMed ID: 30824596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic priming is affected by real-time phonological competition: evidence for continuous cascading systems.
    Apfelbaum KS; Blumstein SE; McMurray B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):141-9. PubMed ID: 21327343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.