These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Limited output transcranial electrical stimulation (LOTES-2017): Engineering principles, regulatory statutes, and industry standards for wellness, over-the-counter, or prescription devices with low risk. Bikson M; Paneri B; Mourdoukoutas A; Esmaeilpour Z; Badran BW; Azzam R; Adair D; Datta A; Fang XH; Wingeier B; Chao D; Alonso-Alonso M; Lee K; Knotkova H; Woods AJ; Hagedorn D; Jeffery D; Giordano J; Tyler WJ Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(1):134-157. PubMed ID: 29122535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Portable and Wearable Brain Technologies for Neuroenhancement and Neurorehabilitation. Naseer N; Ayaz H; Dehais F Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1806374. PubMed ID: 30018976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Current ethical and legal issues in health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Niemiec E; Kalokairinou L; Howard HC Per Med; 2017 Sep; 14(5):433-445. PubMed ID: 29754566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monitoring functional status using a wearable real-time locating technology. Bowen ME Nurs Outlook; 2020; 68(6):727-733. PubMed ID: 32546324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulating consumer use of transcranial direct current stimulation devices. Farrell AM; Carter A; Rogasch NC; Fitzgerald PB Med J Aust; 2018 Jun; 209(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 29954302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices. Segura Anaya LH; Alsadoon A; Costadopoulos N; Prasad PWC Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 28155094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Ethics of Direct-to-Consumer Testing. Gronowski AM; Budelier MM Clin Lab Med; 2020 Mar; 40(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 32008643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "I would rather have it done by a doctor"-laypeople's perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications. Schaper M; Wöhlke S; Schicktanz S Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Mar; 22(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 29705970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposals. Wexler A J Med Ethics; 2016 Apr; 42(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 26324456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures: Demarcation, Deferral, Delegation. Knopf S; Frahm N; M Pfotenhauer S Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 Feb; 29(1):4. PubMed ID: 36729246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A wearable neuro-feedback system with EEG-based mental status monitoring and transcranial electrical stimulation. Roh T; Song K; Cho H; Shin D; Yoo HJ IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2014 Dec; 8(6):755-64. PubMed ID: 25585425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Wearable EEG-HEG-HRV Multimodal System With Simultaneous Monitoring of tES for Mental Health Management. Ha U; Lee Y; Kim H; Roh T; Bae J; Kim C; Yoo HJ IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2015 Dec; 9(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 26742142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuroethics of Neuromodulation: An Update. Zuk P; Torgerson L; Sierra-Mercado D; Lázaro-Muñoz G Curr Opin Biomed Eng; 2018 Dec; 8():45-50. PubMed ID: 30687802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concerns in the Blurred Divisions between Medical and Consumer Neurotechnology. Paek AY; Brantley JA; Evans BJ; Contreras-Vidal JL IEEE Syst J; 2021 Jun; 15(2):3069-3080. PubMed ID: 35126800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct to consumer testing, drugs and gifts. Chadwick R Bioethics; 2020 Mar; 34(3):222. PubMed ID: 32100331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Personal utility is inherent to direct-to-consumer genomic testing. Chung MW; Ng JC J Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 42(10):649-52. PubMed ID: 27250638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]