181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31121596)
1. Role of Ancillary Techniques in Biliary Cytopathology Specimens.
Layfield L
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(1-2):175-181. PubMed ID: 31121596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond cytomorphology: expanding the diagnostic potential for biliary cytology.
Chadwick BE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jun; 40(6):536-41. PubMed ID: 22619128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polysomy and p16 deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.
Gonda TA; Glick MP; Sethi A; Poneros JM; Palmas W; Iqbal S; Gonzalez S; Nandula SV; Emond JC; Brown RS; Murty VV; Stevens PD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 22100297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biliary brushing cytology.
Selvaggi SM
Cytopathology; 2004 Apr; 15(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 15056166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Cytomorphologic and Molecular Assessment of Bile Duct Brushing Specimens.
Hilburn CF; Pitman MB
Surg Pathol Clin; 2022 Sep; 15(3):469-478. PubMed ID: 36049829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Next-Generation Sequencing and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Have Comparable Performance Characteristics in the Analysis of Pancreaticobiliary Brushings for Malignancy.
Dudley JC; Zheng Z; McDonald T; Le LP; Dias-Santagata D; Borger D; Batten J; Vernovsky K; Sweeney B; Arpin RN; Brugge WR; Forcione DG; Pitman MB; Iafrate AJ
J Mol Diagn; 2016 Jan; 18(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 26596524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Next-generation sequencing in the evaluation of biliary strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Scheid JF; Rosenbaum MW; Przybyszewski EM; Krishnan K; Forcione DG; Iafrate AJ; Staller KD; Misdraji J; Lennerz JK; Pitman MB; Pratt DS
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Mar; 130(3):215-230. PubMed ID: 34726838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients.
Chaiteerakij R; Barr Fritcher EG; Angsuwatcharakon P; Ridtitid W; Chaithongrat S; Leerapun A; Baron TH; Kipp BR; Henry MR; Halling KC; Rerknimitr R; Roberts LR
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1228-35. PubMed ID: 26684604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evaluation of MSX2 mRNA expression level in biliary brush cytological specimens.
Ito H; Satoh K; Hamada S; Hirota M; Kanno A; Ishida K; Unno J; Masamune A; Katayose Y; Unno M; Shimosegawa T
Anticancer Res; 2011 Mar; 31(3):1011-7. PubMed ID: 21498730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture.
Fior-Gozlan M; Giovannini D; Rabeyrin M; Mc Leer-Florin A; Laverrière MH; Bichard P
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):330-9. PubMed ID: 26700399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines for pancreatobiliary cytology.
Layfield LJ; Ehya H; Filie AC; Hruban RH; Jhala N; Joseph L; Vielh P; Pitman MB;
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 24639398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma in indeterminate biliary strictures.
Liew ZH; Loh TJ; Lim TKH; Lim TH; Khor CJL; Mesenas SJ; Kong CSC; Ong WC; Tan DMY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Jan; 33(1):315-319. PubMed ID: 28543841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. UroVysion Multi-Target Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Assay for the Detection of Malignant Bile Duct Brushing Specimens: A Comparison with Routine Cytology.
Zhai J
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 29734171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytomorphologic characteristics of next-generation sequencing-positive bile duct brushing specimens.
Rosenbaum MW; Arpin R; Limbocker J; Casey B; Le L; Dudley J; Iafrate AJ; Pitman MB
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):520-527. PubMed ID: 32839152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of KRAS mutation testing in biliary brushing cytology specimens: A 10-year retrospective review.
Sun T; Zuo T; Hui P; Cai G
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Jul; 130(7):558-565. PubMed ID: 35417072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modern diagnostic approaches to cholangiocarcinoma.
Vasilieva LE; Papadhimitriou SI; Dourakis SP
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2012 Aug; 11(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 22893461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of endoscopic bile duct brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
Trent V; Khurana KK; Pisharodi LR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Aug; 123(8):712-5. PubMed ID: 10420229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology.
Kobayashi M; Ryozawa S; Araki R; Nagata K; Tanisaka Y; Fujita A; Kobatake T
Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 58(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 30146607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
