310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31122812)
1. Renal Masses: Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, with a Special Focus on the Pseudocapsule Sign.
Dai WB; Yu B; Diao XH; Cao H; Chen L; Chen Y; Zhan J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1924-1932. PubMed ID: 31122812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Triphasic and epithelioid minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative CEUS characteristics and distinguishing features.
Lu Q; Li CX; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Wang WP
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Feb; 40(2):333-42. PubMed ID: 25139641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Qualitative, quantitative and combination score systems in differential diagnosis of breast lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Wang Y; Fan W; Zhao S; Zhang K; Zhang L; Zhang P; Ma R
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 26724648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Wei SP; Xu CL; Zhang Q; Zhang QR; Zhao YE; Huang PF; Xie YD; Zhou CS; Tian FL; Yang B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2135-2145. PubMed ID: 28331942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of enhancement of renal parenchymal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Cai Y; Du L; Li F; Gu J; Bai M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1387-93. PubMed ID: 24768490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and in Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Meta-analysis.
Zhang F; Li R; Li G; Jin L; Shi Q; Du L
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Apr; 38(4):903-914. PubMed ID: 30203542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of pseudocapsule ring hyperenhancement in contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal focal lesions.
Wang L; Wu H; Li J; Wang Y; Zhang T; Tan Z; Liu Y; Wang H; Sun L; Xu D; Tu J
Ir J Med Sci; 2023 Aug; 192(4):1631-1636. PubMed ID: 36907918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of cystic renal mass: in comparison to contrast-enhanced CT and conventional ultrasound.
Xue LY; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Ma JJ; Yan LX; Wen JX; Wang WP
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Dec; 39(6):1274-83. PubMed ID: 24929667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with conventional ultrasound in solid renal parenchymal lesions.
Cai Y; Li F; Li Z; Li X; Li C; Xia Z; Du L; Wu R
Br J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 94(1125):20210518. PubMed ID: 34319793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: contrast-enhanced ultrasound features relation to tumor size.
Jiang J; Chen Y; Zhou Y; Zhang H
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 18996660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Papillary renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Differentiation of distinct histological types with contrast - enhanced ultrasonography.
Xue LY; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Li Z; Li CX; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1849-56. PubMed ID: 26149528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of adult renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion: comparison with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Wei S; Tian F; Xia Q; Huang P; Zhang Y; Xia Z; Wu M; Yang B
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 20(1):1. PubMed ID: 31892340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small renal masses.
Oh TH; Lee YH; Seo IY
Korean J Urol; 2014 Sep; 55(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25237460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced US for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses.
Atri M; Tabatabaeifar L; Jang HJ; Finelli A; Moshonov H; Jewett M
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 25919803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The place of CEUS in distinguishing benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes: a prospective study.
Poanta L; Serban O; Pascu I; Pop S; Cosgarea M; Fodor D
Med Ultrason; 2014 Mar; 16(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24567918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT for the detection and characterization of renal masses.
Fang L; Bai K; Chen Y; Zhan J; Zhang Y; Qiu Z; Chen L; Wang L
Biosci Trends; 2021 Mar; 15(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 33642452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Value of Qualitative and Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Pathological Subtypes of Small Solid Renal Masses.
He M; Gao Q; Xiang J; Mao Q; Jiang T
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Aug; 42(8):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 36591796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Characteristics of renal occupying lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography].
Zhang S; Lin L; Li JH; Qiu L; Han P
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Nov; 45(6):984-7. PubMed ID: 25571729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities.
Park AY; Kwon M; Woo OH; Cho KR; Park EK; Cha SH; Song SE; Lee JH; Cha J; Son GS; Seo BK
Korean J Radiol; 2019 May; 20(5):759-772. PubMed ID: 30993927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidentally detected splenic lesions in ultrasound: does contrast-enhanced ultrasonography improve the differentiation of benign hemangioma/hamartoma from malignant lesions?
Stang A; Keles H; Hentschke S; von Seydewitz CU; Dahlke J; Habermann C; Wessling J
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32(6):582-92. PubMed ID: 22161555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
