These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31123224)

  • 1. Application of polymeric membranes for the purification of solutions containing cationic surfactants.
    Klimonda A; Kowalska I
    Water Sci Technol; 2019 Apr; 79(7):1241-1252. PubMed ID: 31123224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal of arsenic from groundwater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF).
    Iqbal J; Kim HJ; Yang JS; Baek K; Yang JW
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(5):970-6. PubMed ID: 16884764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of phenol from synthetic waste water using Gemini micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (GMEUF).
    Zhang W; Huang G; Wei J; Li H; Zheng R; Zhou Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Oct; 235-236():128-37. PubMed ID: 22863578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of surfactants by powdered activated carbon and microfiltration.
    Basar CA; Karagunduz A; Cakici A; Keskinler B
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(8):2117-24. PubMed ID: 15087193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvements in permeation and fouling resistance of PVC ultrafiltration membranes via addition of Tetronic-1107 and Triton X-100 as two non-ionic and hydrophilic surfactants.
    Rabiee H; Seyedi SM; Rabiei H; Alvandifar N
    Water Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 74(6):1469-1483. PubMed ID: 27685976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removal of Ni(II) from aqueous solution by using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration.
    Khalid M; Usman M; Siddiq M; Rasool N; Saif MJ; Imran M; Rana UA
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(6):946-51. PubMed ID: 26360754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for the solubilization of various phenolic compounds with different surfactants.
    Huang JH; Zhao Y; Zeng GM; Peng L; Li X; Liu LX; Li F; Shi LX; Yuan F
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 26247762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Produced water treatment by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration.
    Deriszadeh A; Husein MM; Harding TG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1767-72. PubMed ID: 20121232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of groups difference in surfactant on solubilization of aqueous phenol using MEUF.
    Luo F; Zeng GM; Huang JH; Zhang C; Fang YY; Qu YH; Li X; Lin D; Zhou CF
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jan; 173(1-3):455-61. PubMed ID: 19836132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration.
    Figoli A; Cassano A; Criscuoli A; Mozumder MS; Uddin MT; Islam MA; Drioli E
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19781734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regeneration of process water containing surfactants by nanofiltration--investigation and modelling of mass transport.
    Wendler B; Goers B; Wozny G
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):287-92. PubMed ID: 12361023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of cobalt ions from aqueous solutions by polymer assisted ultrafiltration using experimental design approach: part 2: Optimization of hydrodynamic conditions for a crossflow ultrafiltration module with rotating part.
    Cojocaru C; Zakrzewska-Trznadel G; Miskiewicz A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):610-20. PubMed ID: 19414217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for arsenic(V) removal: effect of main operating conditions and dynamic modelling.
    Beolchini F; Pagnanelli F; De Michelis I; Vegliò F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Apr; 40(8):2746-52. PubMed ID: 16683618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ceramic membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of oil/water emulsions: roles played by stabilization surfactants of oil droplets.
    Lu D; Zhang T; Ma J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(7):4235-44. PubMed ID: 25730119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of supporting membrane on removal of cadmium by the hybrid liquid membrane process.
    Garmsiri M; Mortaheb HR; Amini MH
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(1-4):366-76. PubMed ID: 25337970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation on the reaction of phenolic pollutions to mono-rhamnolipid micelles using MEUF.
    Liu Z; Yu M; Zeng G; Li M; Zhang J; Zhong H; Liu Y; Shao B; Li Z; Wang Z; Liu G; Yang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(2):1230-1240. PubMed ID: 27770324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-performance cellulose acetate/polysulfone blend ultrafiltration membranes for removal of heavy metals from water.
    Moradihamedani P; Abdullah AH
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 May; 75(10):2422-2433. PubMed ID: 28541950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Roles of surfactants in pressure-driven membrane separation processes: a review.
    Shi L; Huang J; Zeng G; Zhu L; Gu Y; Shi Y; Yi K; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Oct; 26(30):30731-30754. PubMed ID: 31494849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of surfactants on the removal and acute toxicity of aqueous nC60 aggregates in water treatment process.
    Ge L; Kirumba G; Zhang B; Pal A; He Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Jul; 22(13):9676-85. PubMed ID: 25631739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal of methylene blue from waste water using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration.
    Bielska M; Szymanowski J
    Water Res; 2006 Mar; 40(5):1027-33. PubMed ID: 16472838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.