183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31123419)
1. Total pancreatectomy compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang DJ; Xiong JJ; Liu XT; Li J; Dhanushka Layanthi Siriwardena KM; Hu WM
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():3899-3908. PubMed ID: 31123419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between total pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hong S; Ren J; Zhang S; Yan Y; Liu S; Qi F
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Dec; 93(12):2820-2827. PubMed ID: 37614050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis.
Zhang H; Lan X; Peng B; Li B
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 25(37):5711-5731. PubMed ID: 31602170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy vs pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Huang W; Xiong JJ; Wan MH; Szatmary P; Bharucha S; Gomatos I; Nunes QM; Xia Q; Sutton R; Liu XB
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6361-73. PubMed ID: 26034372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Deng LH; Xiong JJ; Xia Q
J Evid Based Med; 2017 Feb; 10(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27314553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Xiong J; Szatmary P; Huang W; de la Iglesia-Garcia D; Nunes QM; Xia Q; Hu W; Sutton R; Liu X; Raraty MG
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(18):e3497. PubMed ID: 27149448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A case-matched comparison study of total pancreatectomy versus pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Xiong J; Wei A; Ke N; He D; Chian SK; Wei Y; Hu W; Liu X
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():134-141. PubMed ID: 29081373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.
Diener MK; Fitzmaurice C; Schwarzer G; Seiler CM; Hüttner FJ; Antes G; Knaebel HP; Büchler MW
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 11(11):CD006053. PubMed ID: 25387229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Peng L; Lin S; Li Y; Xiao W
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3085-3097. PubMed ID: 27928665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. WITHDRAWN: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.
Diener MK; Heukaeufer C; Schwarzer G; Seiler CM; Antes G; Knaebel HP; Büchler MW
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Feb; (2):CD006053. PubMed ID: 21328281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xia L; Zhang X; Wang X; Xu T; Qin L; Zhang X; Zhong S; Shen Z
Int J Surg; 2016 Jun; 30():109-15. PubMed ID: 27107660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superior mesenteric artery first approach can improve the clinical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis.
Jiang X; Yu Z; Ma Z; Deng H; Ren W; Shi W; Jiao Z
Int J Surg; 2020 Jan; 73():14-24. PubMed ID: 31751791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.
Diener MK; Fitzmaurice C; Schwarzer G; Seiler CM; Antes G; Knaebel HP; Büchler MW
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 May; (5):CD006053. PubMed ID: 21563148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and efficacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhao W; Liu C; Li S; Geng D; Feng Y; Sun M
Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 30217304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with propensity score-based analysis.
Zhang XL; Liu RF; Zhang D; Zhang YS; Wang T
Int J Surg; 2017 Aug; 44():191-203. PubMed ID: 28583897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang DJ; Xiong JJ; Lu HM; Wei Y; Zhang L; Lu S; Hu WM
Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1159. PubMed ID: 30718559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage after pancreatic resection.
Dou CW; Liu ZK; Jia YL; Zheng X; Tu KS; Yao YM; Liu QG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5719-34. PubMed ID: 25987799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini-invasive
Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
