231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31123952)
21. Independent variation in photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance leads to differences in intrinsic water use efficiency in 11 soybean genotypes before and during mild drought.
Gilbert ME; Zwieniecki MA; Holbrook NM
J Exp Bot; 2011 May; 62(8):2875-87. PubMed ID: 21339387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Greater efficiency of water use in poplar clones having a delayed response of mesophyll conductance to drought.
Théroux Rancourt G; Éthier G; Pepin S
Tree Physiol; 2015 Feb; 35(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 25721370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cell wall properties in Oryza sativa influence mesophyll CO
Ellsworth PV; Ellsworth PZ; Koteyeva NK; Cousins AB
New Phytol; 2018 Jul; 219(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 29676468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Uncertainties and limitations of using carbon-13 and oxygen-18 leaf isotope exchange to estimate the temperature response of mesophyll CO
Sonawane BV; Cousins AB
New Phytol; 2019 Apr; 222(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 30394538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implications of the mesophyll conductance to CO2 for photosynthesis and water-use efficiency during long-term water stress and recovery in two contrasting Eucalyptus species.
Cano FJ; López R; Warren CR
Plant Cell Environ; 2014 Nov; 37(11):2470-90. PubMed ID: 24635724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Comparison of the Variable J and Carbon-Isotopic Composition of Sugars Methods to Assess Mesophyll Conductance from the Leaf to the Canopy Scale in Drought-Stressed Cherry.
Marino G; Haworth M; Scartazza A; Tognetti R; Centritto M
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 32059382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Mesophyll conductance to CO
Gong XY; Ma WT; Yu YZ; Li L
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1882-1888. PubMed ID: 34494740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Increased adaxial stomatal density is associated with greater mesophyll surface area exposed to intercellular air spaces and mesophyll conductance in diverse C
Pathare VS; Koteyeva N; Cousins AB
New Phytol; 2020 Jan; 225(1):169-182. PubMed ID: 31400232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicted versus measured photosynthetic water-use efficiency of crop stands under dynamically changing field environments.
Xu LK; Hsiao TC
J Exp Bot; 2004 Nov; 55(407):2395-411. PubMed ID: 15448179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Abscisic Acid Induces Rapid Reductions in Mesophyll Conductance to Carbon Dioxide.
Sorrentino G; Haworth M; Wahbi S; Mahmood T; Zuomin S; Centritto M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148554. PubMed ID: 26862904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mesophyll conductance in land surface models: effects on photosynthesis and transpiration.
Knauer J; Zaehle S; De Kauwe MG; Haverd V; Reichstein M; Sun Y
Plant J; 2020 Feb; 101(4):858-873. PubMed ID: 31659806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Uncoupling of stomatal conductance and photosynthesis at high temperatures: mechanistic insights from online stable isotope techniques.
Diao H; Cernusak LA; Saurer M; Gessler A; Siegwolf RTW; Lehmann MM
New Phytol; 2024 Mar; 241(6):2366-2378. PubMed ID: 38303410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Artefactual responses of mesophyll conductance to CO2 and irradiance estimated with the variable J and online isotope discrimination methods.
Gu L; Sun Y
Plant Cell Environ; 2014 May; 37(5):1231-49. PubMed ID: 24237289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Variation among Soybean Cultivars in Mesophyll Conductance and Leaf Water Use Efficiency.
Bunce J
Plants (Basel); 2016 Dec; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 27973433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Methods of mesophyll conductance estimation: its impact on key biochemical parameters and photosynthetic limitations in phosphorus-stressed soybean across CO2.
Singh SK; Reddy VR
Physiol Plant; 2016 Jun; 157(2):234-54. PubMed ID: 26806194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mesophyll conductance: the leaf corridors for photosynthesis.
Gago J; Daloso DM; Carriquí M; Nadal M; Morales M; Araújo WL; Nunes-Nesi A; Flexas J
Biochem Soc Trans; 2020 Apr; 48(2):429-439. PubMed ID: 32129830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Maximizing leaf carbon gain in varying saline conditions: An optimization model with dynamic mesophyll conductance.
Qiu R; Katul GG
Plant J; 2020 Feb; 101(3):543-554. PubMed ID: 31571298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Screening for Natural Variation in Water Use Efficiency Traits in a Diversity Set of Brassica napus L. Identifies Candidate Variants in Photosynthetic Assimilation.
Pater D; Mullen JL; McKay JK; Schroeder JI
Plant Cell Physiol; 2017 Oct; 58(10):1700-1709. PubMed ID: 29048601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mesophyll conductance in Zea mays responds transiently to CO
Kolbe AR; Cousins AB
New Phytol; 2018 Mar; 217(4):1463-1474. PubMed ID: 29220090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variability of mesophyll conductance and its relationship with water use efficiency in cotton leaves under drought pretreatment.
Han JM; Meng HF; Wang SY; Jiang CD; Liu F; Zhang WF; Zhang YL
J Plant Physiol; 2016 May; 194():61-71. PubMed ID: 27101723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
