BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31124017)

  • 1. Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis.
    Chandnani S; Rathi P; Sonthalia N; Udgirkar S; Jain S; Contractor Q; Jain S; Singh AK
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):117-127. PubMed ID: 31124017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CLINICAL UTILITY OF RISK SCORES IN VARICEAL BLEEDING.
    Chandnani S; Rathi P; Udgirkar SS; Sonthalia N; Contractor Q; Jain S
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2019; 56(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 31633727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Lee ES; Kim SH; Lee BS; Jeong HY
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Etiology and adverse outcome predictors of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 589 patients in Nepal.
    Shrestha UK; Sapkota S
    Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Apr; 59(4):814-22. PubMed ID: 24282053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
    Tantai XX; Liu N; Yang LB; Wei ZC; Xiao CL; Song YH; Wang JH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Progetto Nazionale Emorragia Digestiva (PNED) system vs. the Rockall score as mortality predictors in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A multicenter prospective study.
    Contreras-Omaña R; Alfaro-Reynoso JA; Cruz-Chávez CE; Velarde-Ruiz Velasco A; Flores-Ramírez DI; Romero-Hernández I; Donato-Olguín I; García-Samper X; Bautista-Santos A; Reyes-Bastidas M; Millán-Marín E
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2017; 82(2):123-128. PubMed ID: 28283314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting mortality in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeders: validation of the Italian PNED Score and Prospective Comparison with the Rockall Score.
    Marmo R; Koch M; Cipolletta L; Capurso L; Grossi E; Cestari R; Bianco MA; Pandolfo N; Dezi A; Casetti T; Lorenzini I; Germani U; Imperiali G; Stroppa I; Barberani F; Boschetto S; Gigliozzi A; Gatto G; Peri V; Buzzi A; Della Casa D; Di Cicco M; Proietti M; Aragona G; Giangregorio F; Allegretta L; Tronci S; Michetti P; Romagnoli P; Piubello W; Ferri B; Fornari F; Del Piano M; Pagliarulo M; Di Mitri R; Trallori G; Bagnoli S; Frosini G; Macchiarelli R; Sorrentini I; Pietrini L; De Stefano S; Ceglia T; Chiozzini G; Salvagnini M; Di Muzio D; Rotondano G;
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun; 105(6):1284-91. PubMed ID: 20051943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.