135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31124157)
1. Does the accuracy of case history affect interpretation of videolaryngostroboscopic exams?
Sauder C; Nevdahl M; Kapsner-Smith M; Merati A; Eadie T
Laryngoscope; 2020 Mar; 130(3):718-725. PubMed ID: 31124157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of the auditory signal on videolaryngostroboscopy ratings and interpretation.
Sauder C; Giliberto JP; Eadie T
J Voice; 2023 Sep; 37(5):799.e1-799.e11. PubMed ID: 34112550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of the VLS parameters form for the collection of videolaryngostroboscopic basic findings.
Ricci-Maccarini A; Mozzanica F; Fantini M; Dadduzio S; Bergamini G; Fustos R; Schindler A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 May; 281(5):2489-2497. PubMed ID: 38340161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative evaluation of video laryngostroboscopy: reliability of the basic parameters.
Uloza V; Vegienė A; Pribuišienė R; Šaferis V
J Voice; 2013 May; 27(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 23465526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resident Education in Laryngeal Stroboscopy and Perceptual Voice Evaluation: An Assessment.
Jones JW; Perryman M; Judge P; Baumanis MM; Sykes K; Dowdall J; Cabrera-Muffly C; Garnett JD; Kraft S
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):442-446. PubMed ID: 30545492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From Voice Clinic to Operating Room: Are We Out of Tune?
Awad R; Shamil E; Gibbins N; Aymat A; Harris S
J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):604-608. PubMed ID: 30660339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective trial of voice outcomes after thyroidectomy: evaluation of patient-reported and clinician-determined voice assessments in identifying postthyroidectomy dysphonia.
Stojadinovic A; Henry LR; Howard RS; Gurevich-Uvena J; Makashay MJ; Coppit GL; Shriver CD; Solomon NP
Surgery; 2008 Jun; 143(6):732-42. PubMed ID: 18549889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency and factors associated with use of videolaryngostroboscopy in voice disorder assessment.
Cohen SM; Thomas S; Roy N; Kim J; Courey M
Laryngoscope; 2014 Sep; 124(9):2118-24. PubMed ID: 24659429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of videolaryngostroboscopic images in patients with glottic pathologies.
Niebudek-Bogusz E; Kopczynski B; Strumillo P; Morawska J; Wiktorowicz J; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Jul; 42(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 27132636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voice, speech, and laryngeal features of primary Sjögren's syndrome.
Heller A; Tanner K; Roy N; Nissen SL; Merrill RM; Miller KL; Houtz DR; Ellerston J; Kendall K
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Nov; 123(11):778-85. PubMed ID: 24944270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voice-Vibratory Assessment With Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) Form: Reliability of Rating Stroboscopy and High-speed Videoendoscopy.
Poburka BJ; Patel RR; Bless DM
J Voice; 2017 Jul; 31(4):513.e1-513.e14. PubMed ID: 28040342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic Analysis of Soccer Fans in Acute Phonotrauma After the Match.
Pinarbasli MO; Kaya E; Ozudogru E; Gurbuz MK; Colak E; Aksoy MA; Birdane L; Guney FO
J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 29141772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Change in diagnosis and treatment following specialty voice evaluation: A national database analysis.
Cohen SM; Kim J; Roy N; Wilk A; Thomas S; Courey M
Laryngoscope; 2015 Jul; 125(7):1660-6. PubMed ID: 25676541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Singing voice handicap and videostrobolaryngoscopy in healthy professional singers.
Castelblanco L; Habib M; Stein DJ; de Quadros A; Cohen SM; Noordzij JP
J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 24836361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Videolaryngostroboscopic examination of treatment effects in patients with chronic hyperthrophic larynges].
Kluch W; Olszewski J
Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 19205511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiated vocal tract control and the reliability of interpretations of nasendoscopic assessment.
Madill C; Sheard C; Heard R
J Voice; 2010 May; 24(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 19660904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolated Paresis of Laryngeal Adduction: What Are the Laryngoscopic and Stroboscopic Findings?
Imamura R; Marcelo AM; Tsuji DH
Laryngoscope; 2019 Apr; 129(4):919-925. PubMed ID: 30474273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Videostroboscopy and High-speed Videoendoscopy in Evaluation of Supraglottic Phonation.
Zacharias SR; Myer CM; Meinzen-Derr J; Kelchner L; Deliyski DD; de Alarcón A
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Oct; 125(10):829-37. PubMed ID: 27411363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between the basic video laryngostroboscopic parameters and multidimensional voice measurements.
Uloza V; Vegienė A; Saferis V
J Voice; 2013 Nov; 27(6):744-52. PubMed ID: 24128894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of abnormal laryngeal findings in healthy singing teachers.
Sataloff RT; Hawkshaw MJ; Johnson JL; Ruel B; Wilhelm A; Lurie D
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 22717495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
