These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31124400)

  • 1. Estimating the dependence of mixed sensitive response types in randomized response technique.
    Chu AM; So MK; Chan TW; Tiwari A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):894-910. PubMed ID: 31124400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Randomized Response Approach in Public Health Research: An Empirical Study on the Factors of Illegal Waste Disposal.
    Chong ACY; Chu AMY; So MKP; Chung RSW
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 30889857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimates of Lifetime Extradyadic Sex Using a Hybrid of Randomized Response Technique and Crosswise Design.
    Tu SH; Hsieh SH
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):373-384. PubMed ID: 27164895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size determination for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Li F; Turner EL; Preisser JS
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1450-1458. PubMed ID: 29921006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-randomized response model for sensitive survey with noncompliance.
    Wu Q; Tang ML
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2827-2839. PubMed ID: 24807876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of a randomized response technique for the sensitive question survey in female sex workers in Xichang, China.
    Chen K; Mao Z; Jin Z; Gao G; Bian C
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jan; 10(1):392-403. PubMed ID: 33474945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Poisson and negative binomial item count techniques for surveys with sensitive question.
    Tian GL; Tang ML; Wu Q; Liu Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):931-947. PubMed ID: 25519889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups on mixed-effects models for repeated measures.
    Gosho M; Maruo K
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):578-592. PubMed ID: 29978944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An alternative to unrelated randomized response techniques with logistic regression analysis.
    Hsieh SH; Lee SM; Li CS; Tu SH
    Stat Methods Appt; 2016 Nov; 25(4):601-621. PubMed ID: 31105507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and simulation study.
    Huang S; Fiero MH; Bell ML
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 27094487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blinded sample size re-estimation in superiority and noninferiority trials: bias versus variance in variance estimation.
    Friede T; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23509095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.
    Heck DW; Hoffmann A; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1895-1905. PubMed ID: 28916924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A covariance estimator for GEE with improved small-sample properties.
    Mancl LA; DeRouen TA
    Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 11252587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of correlated scrambling variables in quantitative randomized response technique.
    Murtaza M; Singh S; Hussain Z
    Biom J; 2021 Jan; 63(1):134-147. PubMed ID: 33103272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditional estimation using prior information in 2-stage group sequential designs assuming asymptotic normality when the trial terminated early.
    Shimura M; Maruo K; Gosho M
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):400-413. PubMed ID: 29687592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical inference problems in sequential parallel comparison design.
    Cui Y; Ogbagaber S; Hung HMJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(6):1116-1129. PubMed ID: 31035859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple sensitive estimation and optimal sample size allocation in the item sum technique.
    Perri PF; Rueda García MDM; Cobo Rodríguez B
    Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):155-173. PubMed ID: 28960416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias-corrected variance estimation and hypothesis testing for spatial point and marked point processes using subsampling.
    Guan Y
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):926-36. PubMed ID: 21133879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.