These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31124826)

  • 1. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments.
    Duraisamy R; Krishnan CS; Ramasubramanian H; Sampathkumar J; Mariappan S; Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A
    Implant Dent; 2019 Jun; 28(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 31124826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
    Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Micromovement Evaluation of Original and Compatible Abutments at the Implant-abutment Interface.
    Berberi A; Maroun D; Kanj W; Amine EZ; Philippe A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):907-913. PubMed ID: 27965499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
    Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of microgap size in Morse taper implants with straight and angled abutments.
    Costa MB; Ferreira LF; Marqueti AC; Takeshita WM; Trento CL
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(6):34-39. PubMed ID: 36288073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit at Implant-Abutment Interface of Original and Compatible Nonoriginal Abutments.
    Berberi A; Tehini G; Hjeij B; Aoun G
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2022; 32(3):21-28. PubMed ID: 35993986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Original versus nonoriginal cast-to-gold abutment-implant connection: Analysis of the internal fit and long-term fatigue performance.
    Alonso-Pérez R; Bartolomé JF; Fraile C; Pradíes G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):94.e1-94.e9. PubMed ID: 34006366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A pilot study of joint stability at the zirconium or titanium abutment/titanium implant interface.
    Cavusoglu Y; Akça K; Gürbüz R; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 24683559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading.
    Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical Outcomes, Microleakage, and Marginal Accuracy at the Implant-Abutment Interface of Original versus Nonoriginal Implant Abutments: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.
    Tallarico M; Fiorellini J; Nakajima Y; Omori Y; Takahisa I; Canullo L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2958982. PubMed ID: 30719437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
    Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of different abutment material and surgical insertion torque on the marginal adaptation of an internal conical interface: an in vitro study.
    Farronato D; Pieroni S; Mangano FG; Briguglio F; Re D
    J Prosthodont Res; 2014 Oct; 58(4):230-6. PubMed ID: 24986370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the Use of Transepithelial Abutments vs. Titanium Base Abutments on Microgap Formation at the Dental Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study.
    Cascos R; Celemín-Viñuela A; Mory-Rubiños N; Gómez-Polo C; Ortega R; Agustín-Panadero R; Gómez-Polo M
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Oct; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 37834669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal Torque and Biofilm Accumulation at Two Dental Implant-Abutment Joints After Fatigue.
    Pereira J; Morsch CS; Henriques B; Nascimento RM; Benfatti CA; Silva FS; López-López J; Souza JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):813-9. PubMed ID: 27447147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In Vitro Characterization of Original and Nonoriginal Implant Abutments.
    Karl M; Irastorza-Landa A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 30427953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation.
    Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of castable and premachined metal base abutment/implant interfaces before and after cyclical load.
    De Mori R; Ribeiro CF; da Silva-Concílio LR; Claro Neves AC
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 24637531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
    Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.