189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31125608)
1. Trends of Contraceptive Choices Among Young Women in Inner City Houston.
Patel PR; Abacan A; Smith PB
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 32(5):487-490. PubMed ID: 31125608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Services for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Gaborone, Botswana.
Henry D; Wood S; Moshashane N; Ramontshonyana K; Amutah C; Maleki P; Howlett C; Brooks MJ; Mussa A; Joel D; Steenhoff AP; Akers AY; Morroni C
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 34(4):504-513. PubMed ID: 33766793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in Contraceptive Discontinuation Among Black and White Women: Evidence from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.
Allsworth JE; Secura GM; Ajibade OO; Peipert JF
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 May; 27(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 29768114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Condom Use With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception vs Non-Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Hormonal Methods Among Postpartum Adolescents.
Kortsmit K; Williams L; Pazol K; Smith RA; Whiteman M; Barfield W; Koumans E; Kourtis A; Harrison L; Bauman B; Warner L
JAMA Pediatr; 2019 Jul; 173(7):663-670. PubMed ID: 31107513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initiation and continuation of long-acting reversible contraception in the United States military healthcare system.
Chiles DP; Roberts TA; Klein DA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):328.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27005514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal Trends in the Uptake and Continuation of the Etonogestrel Implant in a Large Private Practice Setting.
Howard DL; Ford A; Ceballos S; Volker KW
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Feb; 27(2):191-195. PubMed ID: 28976797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of an Adolescent Gynecology Provider on Intrauterine Device and Subdermal Contraceptive Implant Use Among Adolescent Patients.
Crain CL; DeFruscio AE; Shah PT; Hunt L; Yoost JL
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 33(4):377-381. PubMed ID: 32087404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postabortion Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception by Adolescent and Nulliparous Women in New Zealand.
Rose SB; Garrett SM
J Adolesc Health; 2016 Feb; 58(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 26603946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Knowledge and Acceptability of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescent Women Receiving School-Based Primary Care Services.
Hoopes AJ; Ahrens KR; Gilmore K; Cady J; Haaland WL; Amies Oelschlager AM; Prager S
J Prim Care Community Health; 2016 Jul; 7(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 27067583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-acting reversible contraceptive acceptability and unintended pregnancy among women presenting for short-acting methods: a randomized patient preference trial.
Hubacher D; Spector H; Monteith C; Chen PL; Hart C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):101-109. PubMed ID: 27662799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.
Bahamondes L; Bottura BF; Bahamondes MV; Gonçalves MP; Correia VM; Espejo-Arce X; Sousa MH; Monteiro I; Fernandes A
Hum Reprod; 2014 Oct; 29(10):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25085802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in Women Who Choose Subdermal Implants Versus Intrauterine Devices.
Lam VC; Hadley EE; Berenson AB; Hirth JM; Jennings K; Patel PR
J Reprod Med; 2016; 61(11-12):529-33. PubMed ID: 30226692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in the Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Nulliparous Women: Results from the 2006-2010, 2011-2013, and 2013-2015 National Survey of Family Growth.
Ihongbe TO; Masho SW
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Mar; 27(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 29148890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adherence to Recommended Practices for Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Providers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.
Judge-Golden CP; Wiesenfeld HC; Chen BA; Borrero S
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Dec; 29(12):1586-1595. PubMed ID: 32667847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Availability of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Los Angeles County clinics through a Medicaid state plan amendment program.
Natavio M; Blotky E; Van Horn CM; Waters C; Ihenacho U; Silverstein E; Cortessis VK; Nelson AL
Contraception; 2018 Dec; 98(6):471-475. PubMed ID: 30076832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Promotion of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescents and Young Adults.
Santibenchakul S; Tschann M; Carlson ADP; L Hurwitz E; Salcedo J
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2019 Mar; 64(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 30570219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.
Brunson MR; Klein DA; Olsen CH; Weir LF; Roberts TA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):55.e1-55.e9. PubMed ID: 28257962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health Care Provider Attitudes about the Safety of "Quick Start" Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents.
Morgan IA; Zapata LB; Curtis KM; Whiteman MK
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 32(4):402-408. PubMed ID: 30731216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adolescent Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use, Same-Day Insertions, and Pregnancies Following a Quality Initiative.
Bruce KH; Merchant MA; Kaskowitz AP; Mickelsen RS; Lau JS
J Adolesc Health; 2023 Nov; 73(5):946-952. PubMed ID: 37436353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current evidence of contraceptive uptake, pregnancy and continuation rates in young women: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
Farah D; Andrade TRM; Di Bella ZIKJ; Girão MJBC; Fonseca MCM
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2020 Dec; 25(6):492-501. PubMed ID: 33140990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
