163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31125899)
1. Does it matter if we approach or withdraw when reading? A comparison of fear-related words and anger-related words.
Huete-Pérez D; Haro J; Hinojosa JA; Ferré P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():73-85. PubMed ID: 31125899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emotional valence and arousal affect reading in an interactive way: neuroimaging evidence for an approach-withdrawal framework.
Citron FM; Gray MA; Critchley HD; Weekes BS; Ferstl EC
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56(100):79-89. PubMed ID: 24440410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiating the influence of incidental anger and fear on risk decision-making.
Yang Q; Zhao D; Wu Y; Tang P; Gu R; Luo YJ
Physiol Behav; 2018 Feb; 184():179-188. PubMed ID: 29196018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands.
Aguado L; Martínez-García N; Solís-Olce A; Dieguez-Risco T; Hinojosa JA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jun; 187():66-76. PubMed ID: 29751931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of valence and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a lexical decision task.
Yao Z; Yu D; Wang L; Zhu X; Guo J; Wang Z
Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():231-242. PubMed ID: 27432482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Turkish Emotional Word Norms for Arousal, Valence, and Discrete Emotion Categories.
Kapucu A; Kılıç A; Özkılıç Y; Sarıbaz B
Psychol Rep; 2021 Feb; 124(1):188-209. PubMed ID: 30514162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Be aware of the rifle but do not forget the stench: differential effects of fear and disgust on lexical processing and memory.
Ferré P; Haro J; Hinojosa JA
Cogn Emot; 2018 Jun; 32(4):796-811. PubMed ID: 28784031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of emotion on working memory: Valence versus motivation.
Yüvrük E; Kapucu A; Amado S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jan; 202():102983. PubMed ID: 31864214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words.
Ortigue S; Michel CM; Murray MM; Mohr C; Carbonnel S; Landis T
Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1242-51. PubMed ID: 15050552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anger in brain and body: the neural and physiological perturbation of decision-making by emotion.
Garfinkel SN; Zorab E; Navaratnam N; Engels M; Mallorquí-Bagué N; Minati L; Dowell NG; Brosschot JF; Thayer JF; Critchley HD
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 11(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 26253525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anger and associated experiences of sadness, fear, valence, arousal, and dominance evoked by visual scenes.
Javela JJ; Mercadillo RE; Martín Ramírez J
Psychol Rep; 2008 Dec; 103(3):663-81. PubMed ID: 19320198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gamma Oscillations in the Temporal Pole Reflect the Contribution of Approach and Avoidance Motivational Systems to the Processing of Fear and Anger Words.
Santaniello G; Ferré P; Sanchez-Carmona A; Huete-Pérez D; Albert J; Hinojosa JA
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():802290. PubMed ID: 35140664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emotional words impact the mind but not the body: evidence from pupillary responses.
Bayer M; Sommer W; Schacht A
Psychophysiology; 2011 Nov; 48(11):1554-1562. PubMed ID: 21592139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of valence and arousal on affective priming vary with the degree of affective experience denoted by words.
Yao Z; Wang Y; Lu B; Zhu X
Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jun; 140():15-25. PubMed ID: 30959075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shock and awe: Distinct effects of taboo words on lexical decision and free recall.
Madan CR; Shafer AT; Chan M; Singhal A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):793-810. PubMed ID: 27003746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Running in fear: an investigation into the dimensional account of emotion in discriminating emotional expressions.
Lo LY; Li WO; Lee LP; Yeung PS
Cogn Process; 2018 Nov; 19(4):505-515. PubMed ID: 29774479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Approach and Withdrawal Tendencies during Written Word Processing: Effects of Task, Emotional Valence, and Emotional Arousal.
Citron FM; Abugaber D; Herbert C
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1935. PubMed ID: 26779067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual differences in emotion word processing: A diffusion model analysis.
Mueller CJ; Kuchinke L
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):489-501. PubMed ID: 26860908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Influence of Negative Orthographic Neighborhood in the Lexical Decision Task: Valence and Arousal Contributions.
Camblats AM; Gobin P; Mathey S
Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):740-754. PubMed ID: 34894850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence.
Kuchinke L; Võ ML; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17532075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
