These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31126592)

  • 1. Musculoskeletal model choice influences hip joint load estimations during gait.
    Weinhandl JT; Bennett HJ
    J Biomech; 2019 Jun; 91():124-132. PubMed ID: 31126592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of increased pushoff during gait on hip joint forces.
    Lewis CL; Garibay EJ
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 25468661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 3D lower limb musculoskeletal model for simultaneous estimation of musculo-tendon, joint contact, ligament and bone forces during gait.
    Moissenet F; Chèze L; Dumas R
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 24210475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of weak hip abductor muscles on joint contact forces during normal walking: probabilistic modeling analysis.
    Valente G; Taddei F; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2186-93. PubMed ID: 23891175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical predictions of hip joint and muscle forces during daily activities: A comparison of musculoskeletal models.
    Mathai B; Gupta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Jun; 233(6):636-647. PubMed ID: 30922155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of altered gait patterns on the hip joint contact forces.
    Carriero A; Zavatsky A; Stebbins J; Theologis T; Lenaerts G; Jonkers I; Shefelbine SJ
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 22587414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpreting Musculoskeletal Models and Dynamic Simulations: Causes and Effects of Differences Between Models.
    Roelker SA; Caruthers EJ; Baker RK; Pelz NC; Chaudhari AMW; Siston RA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 45(11):2635-2647. PubMed ID: 28779473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of a finite-element musculoskeletal model incorporating a deformable contact model of the hip joint during gait.
    Li J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jan; 113():104136. PubMed ID: 33053499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of global and joint-to-joint methods for estimating the hip joint load and the muscle forces during walking.
    Fraysse F; Dumas R; Cheze L; Wang X
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2357-62. PubMed ID: 19699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of femoral anteversion angle and neck-shaft angle on muscle forces and joint loading during walking.
    Kainz H; Mindler GT; Kranzl A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0291458. PubMed ID: 37824447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Altered Walking and Muscle Patterns Reduce Hip Contact Forces in Individuals With Symptomatic Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement.
    Ng KCG; Mantovani G; Modenese L; Beaulé PE; Lamontagne M
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Sep; 46(11):2615-2623. PubMed ID: 30074815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of a subject-specific musculoskeletal model to the uncertainties on the joint axes location.
    Martelli S; Valente G; Viceconti M; Taddei F
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(14):1555-63. PubMed ID: 24963785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing.
    Heller MO; Bergmann G; Kassi JP; Claes L; Haas NP; Duda GN
    J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1155-63. PubMed ID: 15797596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing three generic musculoskeletal models to estimate the tibiofemoral reaction forces during gait and sit-to-stand tasks.
    Pelegrinelli ARM; Catelli DS; Kowalski E; Lamontagne M; Moura FA
    Med Eng Phys; 2023 Dec; 122():104074. PubMed ID: 38092489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative importance of gait vs. joint positioning on hip contact forces after total hip replacement.
    Foucher KC; Hurwitz DE; Wimmer MA
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Dec; 27(12):1576-82. PubMed ID: 19514072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait.
    Lenaerts G; Bartels W; Gelaude F; Mulier M; Spaepen A; Van der Perre G; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1246-51. PubMed ID: 19464012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of predicted knee-joint muscle forces during gait using an instrumented knee implant.
    Kim HJ; Fernandez JW; Akbarshahi M; Walter JP; Fregly BJ; Pandy MG
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Oct; 27(10):1326-31. PubMed ID: 19396858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a musculoskeletal model with prosthetic knee through six experimental gait trials.
    Kia M; Stylianou AP; Guess TM
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Mar; 36(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 24418154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing.
    Heller MO; Bergmann G; Deuretzbacher G; Dürselen L; Pohl M; Claes L; Haas NP; Duda GN
    J Biomech; 2001 Jul; 34(7):883-93. PubMed ID: 11410172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An open source lower limb model: Hip joint validation.
    Modenese L; Phillips AT; Bull AM
    J Biomech; 2011 Aug; 44(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 21742331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.