BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31127182)

  • 1. Background matching and disruptive coloration as habitat-specific strategies for camouflage.
    Price N; Green S; Troscianko J; Tregenza T; Stevens M
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7840. PubMed ID: 31127182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Camouflage and individual variation in shore crabs (Carcinus maenas) from different habitats.
    Stevens M; Lown AE; Wood LE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115586. PubMed ID: 25551233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Hyperspectral Imagery to Assess Cryptic Color Matching in Sargassum Associated Crabs.
    Russell BJ; Dierssen HM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136260. PubMed ID: 26352667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance.
    Troscianko J; Skelhorn J; Stevens M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):7. PubMed ID: 28056761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative camouflage strategies mediate predation risk among closely related co-occurring kelp crabs.
    Hultgren KM; Stachowicz JJ
    Oecologia; 2008 Mar; 155(3):519-28. PubMed ID: 18084779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved camouflage through ontogenetic colour change confers reduced detection risk in shore crabs.
    Nokelainen O; Maynes R; Mynott S; Price N; Stevens M
    Funct Ecol; 2019 Apr; 33(4):654-669. PubMed ID: 31217655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.
    Stevens M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1617):1457-64. PubMed ID: 17426012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.
    Schaefer HM; Stobbe N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1600):2427-32. PubMed ID: 16959631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching.
    Cuthill IC; Stevens M; Sheppard J; Maddocks T; Párraga CA; Troscianko TS
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):72-4. PubMed ID: 15744301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variable crab camouflage patterns defeat search image formation.
    Troscianko J; Nokelainen O; Skelhorn J; Stevens M
    Commun Biol; 2021 Mar; 4(1):287. PubMed ID: 33674781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal background matching camouflage.
    Michalis C; Scott-Samuel NE; Gibson DP; Cuthill IC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jul; 284(1858):. PubMed ID: 28701559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The multiple disguises of spiders: web colour and decorations, body colour and movement.
    Théry M; Casas J
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Feb; 364(1516):471-80. PubMed ID: 18990672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.
    Stevens M; Cuthill IC; Windsor AM; Walker HJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1600):2433-8. PubMed ID: 16959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition.
    Webster RJ; Hassall C; Herdman CM; Godin JG; Sherratt TN
    Biol Lett; 2013; 9(6):20130501. PubMed ID: 24152693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolutionary fine-tuning of background-matching camouflage among geographical populations in the sandy beach tiger beetle.
    Yamamoto N; Sota T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Dec; 287(1941):20202315. PubMed ID: 33323087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phenotype-environment matching in sand fleas.
    Stevens M; Broderick AC; Godley BJ; Lown AE; Troscianko J; Weber N; Weber SB
    Biol Lett; 2015 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 26268993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generalist camouflage can be more successful than microhabitat specialisation in natural environments.
    Briolat ES; Arenas LM; Hughes AE; Liggins E; Stevens M
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 34344323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies.
    Troscianko J; Lown AE; Hughes AE; Stevens M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73733. PubMed ID: 24040046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration.
    Merilaita S; Lind J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Mar; 272(1563):665-70. PubMed ID: 15817442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imperfect transparency and camouflage in glass frogs.
    Barnett JB; Michalis C; Anderson HM; McEwen BL; Yeager J; Pruitt JN; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(23):12885-12890. PubMed ID: 32457164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.