These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31127429)
1. Fracture load of 3D-printed fixed dental prostheses compared with milled and conventionally fabricated ones: the impact of resin material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging-an in vitro study. Reymus M; Fabritius R; Keßler A; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):701-710. PubMed ID: 31127429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion. Reymus M; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31463487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices. Reymus M; Stawarczyk B J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):817-823. PubMed ID: 32444206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture load of milled polymeric fixed dental prostheses as a function of connector cross-sectional areas. Wimmer T; Ender A; Roos M; Stawarczyk B J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 24079564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of printing orientation on the fracture strength of additively manufactured 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses after aging. Diken Turksayar AA; Donmez MB; Olcay EO; Demirel M; Demir E J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104155. PubMed ID: 35526752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of various 3D printed and milled PAEK materials: Effect of printing direction and artificial aging on Martens parameters. Prechtel A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Hickel R; Stawarczyk B Dent Mater; 2020 Feb; 36(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31785832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporary 3D printed fixed dental prosthesis materials: Impact of post printing cleaning methods on degree of conversion as well as surface and mechanical properties. Mayer J; Reymus M; Wiedenmann F; Edelhoff D; Hickel R; Stawarczyk B Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):784–795. PubMed ID: 33616559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of cleaning methods after 3D printing on two-body wear and fracture load of resin-based temporary crown and bridge material. Mayer J; Stawarczyk B; Vogt K; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Reymus M Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Oct; 25(10):5987-5996. PubMed ID: 33811531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of Different Postpolymerization Strategies and Artificial Aging on Hardness of 3D-Printed Resin Materials: An In Vitro Study. Reymus M; Stawarczyk B Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(6):634-640. PubMed ID: 33284905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture load of 4-unit interim fixed partial dentures using 3D-printed and traditionally manufactured materials. Greuling A; Matthies A; Eisenburger M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):607.e1-607.e8. PubMed ID: 36806393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials. Mudhaffer S; Althagafi R; Haider J; Satterthwaite J; Silikas N Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1003-1014. PubMed ID: 38735775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postpolymerization of a 3D-printed denture base polymer: Impact of post-curing methods on surface characteristics, flexural strength, and cytotoxicity. Li P; Lambart AL; Stawarczyk B; Reymus M; Spintzyk S J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103856. PubMed ID: 34695506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture load of three-unit full-contour fixed dental prostheses fabricated with subtractive and additive CAD/CAM technology. Zimmermann M; Ender A; Attin T; Mehl A Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 31286262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance and 2-body wear of 3-dimensional-printed occlusal devices. Lutz AM; Hampe R; Roos M; Lümkemann N; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):166-172. PubMed ID: 30647000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]