These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Multidimensional feature interactions in visual crowding: When configural cues eliminate the polarity advantage. Rummens K; Sayim B J Vis; 2022 May; 22(6):2. PubMed ID: 35503508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision. Chung ST; Mansfield JS Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2782-9. PubMed ID: 19695281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The word superiority effect overcomes crowding. Cutler J; Bodet A; Rivest J; Cavanagh P Vision Res; 2024 Sep; 222():108436. PubMed ID: 38820621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal properties of the polarity advantage effect in crowding. Chakravarthi R; Cavanagh P J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(2):11.1-13. PubMed ID: 18217826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The mechanism of word crowding. Yu D; Akau MM; Chung ST Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 22079315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Foveal crowding in posterior cortical atrophy: a specific early-visual-processing deficit affecting word reading. Crutch SJ; Warrington EK Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Dec; 24(8):843-66. PubMed ID: 18161498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Broad attention uncovers benefits of stimulus uniformity in visual crowding. Rummens K; Sayim B Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23976. PubMed ID: 34907221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast dissimilarity effects on crowding are not simply another case of target saliency. Rashal E; Yeshurun Y J Vis; 2014 Dec; 14(6):9. PubMed ID: 25476716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Crowding between first- and second-order letter stimuli in normal foveal and peripheral vision. Chung ST; Li RW; Levi DM J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(2):10.1-13. PubMed ID: 18217825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid and long-lasting reduction of crowding through training. Yashar A; Chen J; Carrasco M J Vis; 2015; 15(10):15. PubMed ID: 26583278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Chung ST; Levi DM; Legge GE Vision Res; 2001 Jun; 41(14):1833-50. PubMed ID: 11369047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grouping Effects on Foveal Spatial Interactions in Children. Waugh SJ; Formankiewicz MA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 May; 61(5):23. PubMed ID: 32413126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Temporal Modulation on Crowding, Visual Span, and Reading. Haberthy C; Yu D Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 27214251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targets but not flankers are suppressed in crowding as revealed by EEG frequency tagging. Chicherov V; Herzog MH Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():325-31. PubMed ID: 26102568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Martelli M; Majaj NJ; Pelli DG J Vis; 2005 Feb; 5(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 15831067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast. Coates DR; Chin JM; Chung ST Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 90(7):628-38. PubMed ID: 23770657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supercrowding: weakly masking a target expands the range of crowding. Vickery TJ; Shim WM; Chakravarthi R; Jiang YV; Luedeman R J Vis; 2009 Feb; 9(2):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19271922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]