These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31129947)
1. No observed effect from a student-led mock objective structured clinical examination on subsequent performance scores in medical students in Canada. Madrazo L; Lee CB; McConnell M; Khamisa K; Pugh D J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2019; 16():14. PubMed ID: 31129947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A student-initiated objective structured clinical examination as a sustainable cost-effective learning experience. Lee CB; Madrazo L; Khan U; Thangarasa T; McConnell M; Khamisa K Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1440111. PubMed ID: 29480155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study. Inayah AT; Anwer LA; Shareef MA; Nurhussen A; Alkabbani HM; Alzahrani AA; Obad AS; Zafar M; Afsar NA BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e012289. PubMed ID: 28487454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A peer-led mock OSCE improves student confidence for summative OSCE assessments in a traditional medical course. Braier-Lorimer DA; Warren-Miell H Med Teach; 2022 May; 44(5):535-540. PubMed ID: 34822315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical students review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings. Bernard AW; Ceccolini G; Feinn R; Rockfeld J; Rosenberg I; Thomas L; Cassese T Med Educ Online; 2017; 22(1):1324718. PubMed ID: 28521646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of a Student-Driven, Virtual Patient Application on Objective Structured Clinical Examination Performance: Observational Study. Bergeron D; Champagne JN; Qi W; Dion M; Thériault J; Renaud JS J Med Internet Res; 2018 Feb; 20(2):e60. PubMed ID: 29472175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study. Kim KJ; Kim G Korean J Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 32(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 32130851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The benefits of a peer-assisted mock OSCE. Young I; Montgomery K; Kearns P; Hayward S; Mellanby E Clin Teach; 2014 Jun; 11(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 24802924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school. Burt J; Abel G; Barclay M; Evans R; Benson J; Gurnell M BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012541. PubMed ID: 27729351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceived and actual value of Student-led Objective Structured Clinical Examinations. Stretton B; Montagu A; Kunnel A; Louise J; Behrendt N; Kovoor J; Bacchi S; Thomas J; Davies E Clin Teach; 2024 Aug; 21(4):e13754. PubMed ID: 38429878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs. Bevan J; Russell B; Marshall B BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):126. PubMed ID: 31046773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing Advanced Communication Skills via Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Comparison of Faculty Versus Self, Peer, and Standardized Patient Assessors. Talwalkar JS; Murtha TD; Prozora S; Fortin AH; Morrison LJ; Ellman MS Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):294-307. PubMed ID: 32141335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam. Stansfield RB; Diponio L; Craig C; Zeller J; Chadd E; Miller J; Monrad S BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):268. PubMed ID: 27741946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-assessment differences between genders in a low-stakes objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Madrazo L; Lee CB; McConnell M; Khamisa K BMC Res Notes; 2018 Jun; 11(1):393. PubMed ID: 29903050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and benefits of medical student peers in rating complex clinical skills. Basehore PM; Pomerantz SC; Gentile M Med Teach; 2014 May; 36(5):409-14. PubMed ID: 24597711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can training in musculoskeletal examination skills be effectively delivered by undergraduate students as part of the standard curriculum? Perry ME; Burke JM; Friel L; Field M Rheumatology (Oxford); 2010 Sep; 49(9):1756-61. PubMed ID: 20525742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. e-Learning for enhancement of medical student performance at the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Kim KJ; Lee YJ; Lee MJ; Kim YH PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253860. PubMed ID: 34197528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of outcomes of a formative objective structured clinical examination for second-year UK medical students. Chisnall B; Vince T; Hall S; Tribe R Int J Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 6():76-83. PubMed ID: 26094249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer assisted Objective structured clinical examination versus Objective structured clinical examination in assessment of Dermatology undergraduate students. Chaudhary R; Grover C; Bhattacharya SN; Sharma A Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2017; 83(4):448-452. PubMed ID: 28540874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Students' perceptions of a near-peer Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in medical imaging. Taylor D; Quick S Radiography (Lond); 2020 Feb; 26(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31902454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]