These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery. Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials? Miles RC; Choi P; Baird GL; Dibble EH; Lamb L; Garg M; Lehman C Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 31839567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants. Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehension of Online Educational Material Regarding Orofacial Clefts. Jodeh DS; Pringle AJ; Rottgers SA Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1206-1212. PubMed ID: 30943779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery. Miles RC; Baird GL; Choi P; Falomo E; Dibble EH; Garg M Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 30694156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comprehensive Assessment of Cleft Lip and Palate Websites and Patient Education Information. Sunkara PR; Powell LE; Quick JD; Landis GH Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 Jun; 61(6):945-952. PubMed ID: 36604789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability assessment of patient education materials on major otolaryngology association websites. Eloy JA; Li S; Kasabwala K; Agarwal N; Hansberry DR; Baredes S; Setzen M Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 22864405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website. Eltorai AE; Han A; Truntzer J; Daniels AH Phys Sportsmed; 2014 Nov; 42(4):125-30. PubMed ID: 25419896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources. Kong KA; Hu A Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus. Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer. Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias. Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]