BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31130291)

  • 1. Acoustic Analysis of Normal Voice Patterns in Italian Adults by Using Praat.
    Gorris C; Ricci Maccarini A; Vanoni F; Poggioli M; Vaschetto R; Garzaro M; Aluffi Valletti P
    J Voice; 2020 Nov; 34(6):961.e9-961.e18. PubMed ID: 31130291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective Evaluation of Presbyphonia: Spectroacoustic Study on 142 Patients with Praat.
    Mezzedimi C; Di Francesco M; Livi W; Spinosi MC; De Felice C
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e25-257.e32. PubMed ID: 27427181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic Analysis of Normal Voice Patterns in Pakistani Adults.
    Ambreen S; Bashir N; Tarar SA; Kausar R
    J Voice; 2019 Jan; 33(1):124.e49-124.e58. PubMed ID: 29033256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
    Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Bohlender JE; Mehta DD
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 28528786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) vs Praat for Assessing Euphonic Subjects: A Preliminary Study on the Gender-discriminating Power of Acoustic Analysis Software.
    Lovato A; De Colle W; Giacomelli L; Piacente A; Righetto L; Marioni G; de Filippis C
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e1-765.e5. PubMed ID: 26975896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic vocal measures in women without voice complaints and with normal larynxes.
    Finger LS; Cielo CA; Schwarz K
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2009; 75(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 19649496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
    Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic and Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice in the Female Smokers Who Do Not Have Self-Reported Voice Complaint.
    Onen C; Golac H; Tunc Songur E; Kemaloglu YK
    J Voice; 2023 Mar; 37(2):297.e1-297.e6. PubMed ID: 33451894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Acoustic Voice Features Derived From Mobile Devices and Studio Microphone Recordings.
    Fahed VS; Doheny EP; Busse M; Hoblyn J; Lowery MM
    J Voice; 2022 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 36379826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliable acoustic measurements in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years: Gender, age, height and weight effects on fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer in phonations without and with controlled voice SPL.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Beyer D; Bohlender JE
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2035-42. PubMed ID: 26412461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vocal characteristics of 5-year-old children: proposed normative values based on a French-speaking population
    Remacle A; Genel Y; Segers M; de Bodt M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Apr; 45(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 30648500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Voice loudness and gender effects on jitter and shimmer in healthy adults.
    Brockmann M; Storck C; Carding PN; Drinnan MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1152-60. PubMed ID: 18664710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vocal acoustic features may be objective biomarkers of negative symptoms in schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study.
    Zhao Q; Wang WQ; Fan HZ; Li D; Li YJ; Zhao YL; Tian ZX; Wang ZR; Tan YL; Tan SP
    Schizophr Res; 2022 Dec; 250():180-185. PubMed ID: 36423443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Assessment of Different Praat Versions for Acoustic Measures Analyzed Automatically by VoiceEvalU8 and Manually by Two Raters.
    Grillo EU; Wolfberg J
    J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 33384248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.
    Mohseni R; Sandoughdar N
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective Voice Analysis of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients and Comparison With Hearing Aids Users and Hearing Controls.
    Jafari N; Izadi F; Salehi A; Dabirmoghaddam P; Yadegari F; Ebadi A; Moghadam ST
    J Voice; 2017 Jul; 31(4):505.e11-505.e18. PubMed ID: 27865551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate effect of inspiratory exercise with exerciser and respiratory encourager in women without vocal complaints.
    Beraldo AT; Batistella J; Martins PDN; Dassie-Leite AP; Pereira EC
    Codas; 2024; 36(4):e20230148. PubMed ID: 38775526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic Voice Analysis of Young Turkish Speakers.
    Demirhan E; Unsal EM; Yilmaz C; Ertan E
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):378.e21-5. PubMed ID: 26223964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice Acoustic Analysis of Pediatric Vocal Nodule Patients Using Ratios Calculated With Biomedical Image Segmentation.
    Bilal N; Selcuk T; Sarica S; Alkan A; Orhan İ; Doganer A; Sagiroglu S; Kılıc MA
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 29273231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.