These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31130408)

  • 1. [Uterine preservation or not during prolapse surgery: Review of the literature].
    Joueidi Y; Gueudry P; Cardaillac C; Vaucel E; Lopes P; Winer N; Dochez V; Thubert T
    Prog Urol; 2019 Dec; 29(17):1021-1034. PubMed ID: 31130408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
    Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B
    Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Oliveira SA; Fonseca MCM; Bortolini MAT; Girão MJBC; Roque MT; Castro RA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1617-1630. PubMed ID: 28780651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Uterus preserving surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of uterine descent: a systematic review].
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Vierhout ME; van Eijndhoven HW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(42):A3623. PubMed ID: 22027462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
    Ridgeway BM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 213(6):802-9. PubMed ID: 26226554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
    Gutman RE
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.
    Maher C; Baessler K; Glazener CM; Adams EJ; Hagen S
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 18092333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Balk EM; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):505-522. PubMed ID: 30741318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-frame comparison of hystero-preservation in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study, 2006-2013 versus 1997-2005.
    Lin YL; Lo TS; Long CY; Law KS; Ho CH; Wu MP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1839-1850. PubMed ID: 31802163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prevention of the complications related to the use of prosthetic meshes in prolapse surgery: guidelines for clinical practice - literature review].
    Deffieux X; Savary D; Letouzey V; Sentilhes L; Agostini A; Mares P; Pierre F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2011 Dec; 40(8):827-50. PubMed ID: 22056180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?
    Norinho de Oliveira P; Bourdel N; Rabischong B; Canis M; Botchorishvili R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 26408228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A randomized comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of uterine prolapse using polypropylene mesh: hysteropexy versus hysterectomy].
    Carramão S; Auge AP; Pacetta AM; Duarte E; Ayrosa P; Lemos NL; Aoki T
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2009 Feb; 36(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 20076870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review.
    Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.
    Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical and functional outcomes.
    Chan CM; Liang HH; Go WW; To WW; Mok KM
    Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Aug; 17(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21813899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.