151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31130762)
1. Accurate and Efficient
Liu Y; Xie J
J Am Stat Assoc; 2019; 114(525):384-392. PubMed ID: 31130762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytic P-value calculation for the higher criticism test in finite
Barnett IJ; Lin X
Biometrika; 2014; 101(4):964-970. PubMed ID: 25750439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On Sample Size and Power Calculation for Variant Set-Based Association Tests.
Wu B; Pankow JS
Ann Hum Genet; 2016 Mar; 80(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 26831402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Valid Monte Carlo permutation tests for genetic case-control studies with missing genotypes.
Kinnamon DD; Martin ER
Genet Epidemiol; 2014 May; 38(4):325-44. PubMed ID: 24723341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cauchy combination test: a powerful test with analytic
Liu Y; Xie J
J Am Stat Assoc; 2020; 115(529):393-402. PubMed ID: 33012899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficient Monte Carlo evaluation of resampling-based hypothesis tests with applications to genetic epidemiology.
Fung WK; Yu K; Yang Y; Zhou JY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1437-1450. PubMed ID: 27507290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AP-SKAT: highly-efficient genome-wide rare variant association test.
Hasegawa T; Kojima K; Kawai Y; Misawa K; Mimori T; Nagasaki M
BMC Genomics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):745. PubMed ID: 27654840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient p-value evaluation for resampling-based tests.
Yu K; Liang F; Ciampa J; Chatterjee N
Biostatistics; 2011 Jul; 12(3):582-93. PubMed ID: 21209154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A hybrid method of the sequential Monte Carlo and the Edgeworth expansion for computation of very small
Yang JJ; Trucco EM; Buu A
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):2937-2951. PubMed ID: 30073912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gumbel based p-value approximations for spatial scan statistics.
Abrams AM; Kleinman K; Kulldorff M
Int J Health Geogr; 2010 Dec; 9():61. PubMed ID: 21167043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MCPerm: a Monte Carlo permutation method for accurately correcting the multiple testing in a meta-analysis of genetic association studies.
Jiang Y; Zhang L; Kong F; Zhang M; Lv H; Liu G; Liao M; Feng R; Li J; Zhang R
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89212. PubMed ID: 24586601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic Variant Set-Based Tests Using the Generalized Berk-Jones Statistic with Application to a Genome-Wide Association Study of Breast Cancer.
Sun R; Lin X
J Am Stat Assoc; 2020; 115(531):1079-1091. PubMed ID: 33041403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Funnel hopping Monte Carlo: An efficient method to overcome broken ergodicity.
Finkler JA; Goedecker S
J Chem Phys; 2020 Apr; 152(16):164106. PubMed ID: 32357793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Avoiding the high Bonferroni penalty in genome-wide association studies.
Gao X; Becker LC; Becker DM; Starmer JD; Province MA
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 34(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19434714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation via corrected scores in general semiparametric regression models with error-prone covariates.
Maity A; Apanasovich TV
Electron J Stat; 2011; 5():1424-1449. PubMed ID: 22773940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid and accurate multiple testing correction and power estimation for millions of correlated markers.
Han B; Kang HM; Eskin E
PLoS Genet; 2009 Apr; 5(4):e1000456. PubMed ID: 19381255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the calculation of statistical significance in genome-wide scans.
Angquist L; Hössjer O
Biostatistics; 2005 Oct; 6(4):520-38. PubMed ID: 15831574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient computation of partial expected value of sample information using Bayesian approximation.
Brennan A; Kharroubi SA
J Health Econ; 2007 Jan; 26(1):122-48. PubMed ID: 16945438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient calculation of empirical P-values for genome-wide linkage analysis through weighted permutation.
Medland SE; Schmitt JE; Webb BT; Kuo PH; Neale MC
Behav Genet; 2009 Jan; 39(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 18810631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
