These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31130903)

  • 1. Human Factors in the Cybersecurity of Autonomous Vehicles: Trends in Current Research.
    Linkov V; Zámečník P; Havlíčková D; Pai CW
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():995. PubMed ID: 31130903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A conceptual system dynamics model for cybersecurity assessment of connected and autonomous vehicles.
    Khalid Khan S; Shiwakoti N; Stasinopoulos P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106515. PubMed ID: 34890922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multinational empirical study of perceived cyber barriers to automated vehicles deployment.
    Khan SK; Shiwakoti N; Stasinopoulos P; Warren M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):1842. PubMed ID: 36725959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cyber-attacks in the next-generation cars, mitigation techniques, anticipated readiness and future directions.
    Khan SK; Shiwakoti N; Stasinopoulos P; Chen Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105837. PubMed ID: 33120180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.
    Nifakos S; Chandramouli K; Nikolaou CK; Papachristou P; Koch S; Panaousis E; Bonacina S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Formulating Cybersecurity Requirements for Autonomous Ships Using the SQUARE Methodology.
    Yoo J; Jo Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 37299766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transforming Healthcare Cybersecurity from Reactive to Proactive: Current Status and Future Recommendations.
    Bhuyan SS; Kabir UY; Escareno JM; Ector K; Palakodeti S; Wyant D; Kumar S; Levy M; Kedia S; Dasgupta D; Dobalian A
    J Med Syst; 2020 Apr; 44(5):98. PubMed ID: 32239357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional).
    Wasserman L; Wasserman Y
    Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():862221. PubMed ID: 36033634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cybersecurity Risk Analysis of Electric Vehicles Charging Stations.
    Hamdare S; Kaiwartya O; Aljaidi M; Jugran M; Cao Y; Kumar S; Mahmud M; Brown D; Lloret J
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jul; 23(15):. PubMed ID: 37571500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterizing and Measuring Maliciousness for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment.
    King ZM; Henshel DS; Flora L; Cains MG; Hoffman B; Sample C
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():39. PubMed ID: 29459838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cybersecurity in Internet of Medical Vehicles: State-of-the-Art Analysis, Research Challenges and Future Perspectives.
    Bhukya CR; Thakur P; Mudhivarthi BR; Singh G
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Sep; 23(19):. PubMed ID: 37836937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cyberattack Models for Ship Equipment Based on the MITRE ATT&CK Framework.
    Jo Y; Choi O; You J; Cha Y; Lee DH
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 35271006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the associations between driving volatility and autonomous vehicle hazardous scenarios: Insights from field operational test data.
    Yu R; Li S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106537. PubMed ID: 34952369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A deeper look into cybersecurity issues in the wake of Covid-19: A survey.
    Alawida M; Omolara AE; Abiodun OI; Al-Rajab M
    J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci; 2022 Nov; 34(10):8176-8206. PubMed ID: 37521180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shaping driver-vehicle interaction in autonomous vehicles: How the new in-vehicle systems match the human needs.
    Sun X; Cao S; Tang P
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103238. PubMed ID: 33010571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal traffic conflict analysis of autonomous and traditional vehicle platoons in field tests via surrogate safety measures.
    Das T; Shoaib Samandar M; Rouphail N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106822. PubMed ID: 36103759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling cybersecurity regulations for automated vehicles.
    Khalid Khan S; Shiwakoti N; Stasinopoulos P; Warren M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107054. PubMed ID: 37023653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I; Mohammadnazar A; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.