136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31131247)
1. Comparison of OA-2000 and IOL Master 500 using in cataract patients with high myopia.
Du YL; Wang G; Huang HC; Lin LY; Jin C; Liu LF; Liu XR; Zhang MZ
Int J Ophthalmol; 2019; 12(5):844-847. PubMed ID: 31131247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900.
Song JS; Yoon DY; Hyon JY; Jeon HS
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 32233146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biometry and Intraocular Lens Power Calculation by Combined Scheimpflug-Placido Disc versus Optical Interferometry Devices.
Juliane M; Anne-Isabel L; Myriam C; Vasyl D; Toam K; J Linke S
J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2022; 17(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 36620702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.
Jeong J; Song H; Lee JK; Chuck RS; Kwon JW
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 28464806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. COMPARISON OF OPTICAL BIOMETERS ARGOS AND IOL MASTER 700.
Románek J; Sluková K
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2021; 77(6):295-299. PubMed ID: 35081719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500.
Reitblat O; Levy A; Kleinmann G; Assia EI
Eye (Lond); 2018 Jul; 32(7):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 29527012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of IOL-Master 700 and IOL-Master 500 biometers in ocular biological parameters of adolescents.
Shi Q; Wang GY; Cheng YH; Pei C
Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(7):1013-1017. PubMed ID: 34282385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The analysis of refractive error of long axial high myopic eyes after IOL implantation].
Zheng Q; Zhao Z; Lian H; Zhao Y
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 51(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 26081231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients.
Kongsap P
Eye Vis (Lond); 2016; 3():27. PubMed ID: 27833928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820.
Labiris G; Ntonti P; Ntitsos K; Katsanos A; Sideroudi H; Kozobolis V
Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():753-758. PubMed ID: 28461737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J
Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pitfalls of IOL power prediction after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia -- case report, practical recommendations and literature review].
Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Haigis W
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Dec; 219(12):840-50. PubMed ID: 12548468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation.
Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of Lenstar and IOLMaster for intraocular lens power calculation].
Huang JH; Yang X; Wang QM; Cheng SM; Chen J
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 48(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 23302275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
