These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31131848)
1. The Ethics of Socially Assistive Robots in Aged Care. A Focus Group Study With Older Adults in Flanders, Belgium. Vandemeulebroucke T; Dierckx de Casterlé B; Welbergen L; Massart M; Gastmans C J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2020 Oct; 75(9):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 31131848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Vandemeulebroucke T; de Casterlé BD; Gastmans C Aging Ment Health; 2018 Feb; 22(2):149-167. PubMed ID: 28282732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Older adults' experiences with and perceptions of the use of socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of quantitative evidence. Vandemeulebroucke T; Dzi K; Gastmans C Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2021; 95():104399. PubMed ID: 33813208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics of socially assistive robots in aged-care settings: a socio-historical contextualisation. Vandemeulebroucke T; Dierckx de Casterlé B; Gastmans C J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 31818967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Socially Assistive Robots in Aged Care: Ethical Orientations Beyond the Care-Romantic and Technology-Deterministic Gaze. Vandemeulebroucke T; Dierckx de Casterlé B; Gastmans C Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Mar; 27(2):17. PubMed ID: 33733370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Older adults' experiences and perceptions of living with Bomy, an assistive dailycare robot: a qualitative study. Gasteiger N; Ahn HS; Fok C; Lim J; Lee C; MacDonald BA; Kim GH; Broadbent E Assist Technol; 2022 Jul; 34(4):487-497. PubMed ID: 33544067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Christian anthropology-based contributions to the ethics of socially assistive robots in care for older adults. Gastmans C; Sinibaldi E; Lerner R; Yáñez M; Kovács L; Palazzani L; Pegoraro R; Vandemeulebroucke T Bioethics; 2024 Nov; 38(9):787-795. PubMed ID: 38857488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stakeholders' Perceptions Sought to Inform the Development of a Low-Cost Mobile Robot for Older Adults: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Sefcik JS; Johnson MJ; Yim M; Lau T; Vivio N; Mucchiani C; Cacchione PZ Clin Nurs Res; 2018 Feb; 27(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 28918654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When robots care: Public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults. Lehoux P; Grimard D Soc Sci Med; 2018 Aug; 211():330-337. PubMed ID: 30015242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical challenges in the use of social service robots for elderly people. Körtner T Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2016 Jun; 49(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 27220734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting. Wu YH; Wrobel J; Cornuet M; Kerhervé H; Damnée S; Rigaud AS Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():801-11. PubMed ID: 24855349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caregiver perspectives on a smart home-based socially assistive robot for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia. Arthanat S; Begum M; Gu T; LaRoche DP; Xu D; Zhang N Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Oct; 15(7):789-798. PubMed ID: 32299272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review. Papadopoulos I; Koulouglioti C; Lazzarino R; Ali S BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033096. PubMed ID: 31924639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders. Wangmo T; Lipps M; Kressig RW; Ienca M BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 31856798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The perspectives of older adults with mild cognitive impairment and their caregivers on the use of socially assistive robots in healthcare: exploring factors that influence attitude in a pre-implementation stage. Van Assche M; Petrovic M; Cambier D; Calders P; Van Gelder P; Van de Velde D Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Jan; 19(1):222-232. PubMed ID: 35587020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study. Chu L; Chen HW; Cheng PY; Ho P; Weng IT; Yang PL; Chien SE; Tu YC; Yang CC; Wang TM; Fung HH; Yeh SL Gerontology; 2019; 65(4):441-450. PubMed ID: 30844813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assimilation of socially assistive robots by older adults: an interplay of uses, constraints and outcomes. Zafrani O; Nimrod G; Krakovski M; Kumar S; Bar-Haim S; Edan Y Front Robot AI; 2024; 11():1337380. PubMed ID: 38646472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eliciting a User's Preferences by the Self-Disclosure of Socially Assistive Robots in Local Households of Older Adults to Facilitate Verbal Human-Robot Interaction. Igarashi T; Nihei M; Inoue T; Sugawara I; Kamata M Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 36141591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Home-Based Cognitively Assistive Robots: Maximizing Cognitive Functioning and Maintaining Independence in Older Adults Without Dementia. Van Patten R; Keller AV; Maye JE; Jeste DV; Depp C; Riek LD; Twamley EW Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():1129-1139. PubMed ID: 32764900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]