These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31132392)

  • 1. Pediatric intraocular pressure measurements: Tonometers, central corneal thickness, and anesthesia.
    Fayed MA; Chen TC
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2019; 64(6):810-825. PubMed ID: 31132392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers.
    Firat PG; Orman G; Doganay S; Demirel S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Mar; 96(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 23320621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data.
    Chihara E
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2008; 53(3):203-18. PubMed ID: 18501267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
    Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraocular pressure in a cohort of healthy eastern European schoolchildren: variations in method and corneal thickness.
    Krzyżanowska-Berkowska P; Asejczyk-Widlicka M; Pierscionek B
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2012 Dec; 12():61. PubMed ID: 23199262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies.
    Herndon LW
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 16552245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New technologies for measuring intraocular pressure.
    Garcia-Feijoo J; Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Morales-Fernandez L; Saenz Frances F; Santos-Bueso E; Garcia-Saenz S; Mendez-Hernandez C
    Prog Brain Res; 2015; 221():67-79. PubMed ID: 26518073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Latanoprost treatment differentially affects intraocular pressure readings obtained with three different tonometers.
    Sánchez-Barahona C; Bolívar G; Katsanos A; Teus MA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1112-e1115. PubMed ID: 31184426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
    Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
    Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.